Is it correct that the shooter was living with his mother in Winchester?
What we know about suspected Oregon shooter Chris Harper Mercer
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/umpqua-community-college-shooting-chris-harper-mercer
Is it correct that the shooter was living with his mother in Winchester?
"Mintz spent most of Thursday in surgery after receiving seven gunshots during the attack. Family members said Mintz was able to talk to loved ones before going into surgery. He told them that he heard gunshots in another classroom and tried to keep the gunman from entering his classroom."
[...]
"Family members said both of Mintz’s legs are broken and he will have to relearn to walk, but he is now recovering and expected to survive. No vital organs were hit."
Randleman victim in Oregon community college shooting tried to stop gunman, family says
FOX8 NC
How you can help: A community responds
KGW8
I agree. We don't need to glorify these terrible people. Still, something seems just as wrong with a headline reading "Somebody just killed 10 people. Here are the 10 victims." That sound like it was simply an act of God like a hurricane. Or just anyone off the street. We need to know and identify the killer to shock us and to eventually get us off our butts and try to do something. The evil still needs to be named. That's my opinion.
In my experience (both parents immigrated from Europe and most of my family is still there), sex is not censored from kids but violence is. I thought that's what the poster meant? I think violence is destructive to developing minds. I don't think sex is as much unless it is combined with violence or degradation (or unless it is being actually done to kids by an adult or older person).
This may not be a popular opinion but I think a reason we see this continue to happen is because of sites like 4chan. I think, before the Internet, kids who were maybe on the outside of things had a lot of these feelings, but didn't get validation of it from a huge group of people who tell them they would be heroes for slaughtering people. Typically, they would get out of highschool and continue on with their lives and things got better. Now, they separate from reality into this fantasyland and devolve into these monsters.
I agree that the shooter should never be more important than the victims. Mass killings happened before, and killers were named throughout history, so I don't think that is the sole problem. But I don't like seeing the killer over and over again with so little focus on the victims. Parents, teachers and friends need to know what the signs are, they need to see that it could be their kid, they need to know about sites like 4chan. Knowledge is power, we need to know about the killer, but we need to know about the victims too.
Oh yes, regarding sex they are much more liberal! It is graphic violence that they restrict much more than we do here. Kids do not have access to that crap like they do here.
Was not speaking to their views about sex at all.
This may not be a popular opinion but I think a reason we see this continue to happen is because of sites like 4chan. I think, before the Internet, kids who were maybe on the outside of things had a lot of these feelings, but didn't get validation of it from a huge group of people who tell them they would be heroes for slaughtering people. Typically, they would get out of highschool and continue on with their lives and things got better. Now, they separate from reality into this fantasyland and devolve into these monsters.
I agree that the shooter should never be more important than the victims. Mass killings happened before, and killers were named throughout history, so I don't think that is the sole problem. But I don't like seeing the killer over and over again with so little focus on the victims. Parents, teachers and friends need to know what the signs are, they need to see that it could be their kid, they need to know about sites like 4chan. Knowledge is power, we need to know about the killer, but we need to know about the victims too.
Is it correct that the shooter was living with his mother in Winchester?
Bless his soul!
This doesn't seem logical to me. How does the name "shock us and to eventually get us off our butts and try to do something". It's the ac t that is shocking. Not the name. And we have heard the names of how many mass murderers? Are we shocked enough yet by hearing their scary names? Have we got off our butts and done something yet?
I guess maybe it is more fun, or something, to investigate a coward's life and post things about him on the internet than it is to actually read the actual, in-depth, intensive research on HUNDREDS of mass-murderers throughout history, what they have in common, what motivates them, their psych profiles and personalities. Not so much to me, but I guess to others.
Finally, why is it between naming them and plastering their faces all over the media and reporting, only, "Somebody just killed 10 people. Here are the 10 victims."
I'm sorry but that makes zero sense.
What happened, where, how, when, the details of the event, 911 tapes, video, photos, etc., as well as a profile of the murderer - age, sex, ethnic background, religion, political ideology,job history, education level, family make-up, living situation, even internet activity, and planning, what is found in his home, guns used, possible psych treatment, ALL of that can be reported without naming the person or showing their picture.
Sorry Truthy,my mistake.Not sure why my mind went there(sex).
BBM. Interesting parallel.
Oh wow. Just brings me to tears. Horrible.
I'm sorry, maybe I'm not clear. The incentive for this guy was the knowledge that he would be known across the country. That was his incentive. It is irrelevant that he is not here to enjoy that notoriety. 'He knew it would be there. More important, the incentive for every other sicko who is watching the news and printing out photos and articles about the murders is being developed every time his name is mentioned and every time his photo is shown.
I don't think I'm crazy here or out of left field. Experts and victims seem to agree with me:
1. No Name. No Photo. No Notoriety.http://nonotoriety.com/
2.What Mass Killers WantAnd How to Stop Them
Rampage shooters crave the spotlight, and we should do everything possible to deprive them of it.http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303309504579181702252120052
(Waaay more at link. Incredibly in depth article that basically explains everything some are claiming we can only learn through personal knowledge of these murderers names.)
3. The Medias Complicity in Granting Fame to Mass Killers
http://peterdaou.com/2015/06/time-for-the-media-to-censor-the-names-of-fame-seeking-mass-killers/
(More at link)
4. A psychiatrist's insightful perspective on news coverage's perpetuation of mass shootings in schools:
[video=youtube;PezlFNTGWv4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PezlFNTGWv4[/video]
5. Academic journal article in the Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 9:1 [Winter 1993-94]:
Ethical Problems of Mass Murder Coverage In The Mass Mediahttp://www.claytoncramer.com/scholarly/JMME2.htm
6. Let's stop giving murderers the publicity they'd kill for
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/stop-giving-murderers-publicity-kill-article-1.272193
In any event, I feel very certain about the ramifications of publicizing identifying and other info about these lunatics and I just feel it is voyeuristic and seriously unethical.
There is one definitive way we can reduce these killings that is simple and easy to do. I hope everyone looks into their hearts and supports a push for the media to stop giving these creeps what they crave. And stop fueling the next one.
I won't remember his name. I won't write it or read it. I'm heart sick about this, yet another senseless slaughter. So sad. And so sad that people think their curiosity is more important than the lives of others.
What difference does it make? The killer is DEAD. He's not going to enjoy any of his "notoriety."
it seems like we should wait to find out if the person actually ever posted on or read 4chan before we blame them for anything.
Even believing that, it does not make it true that the guns were illegally obtained as was stated as a fact upthread.