Fairy1
VOTE!!!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
- Messages
- 10,301
- Reaction score
- 3,890
Why is the answer more often about meet the shooter and fight back with a gun, not prevent the shooter from getting a gun and arriving on the scene with it in the first place?
We've resigned to letting these cowards show up wherever they want, whenever they want, and carrying the weapons of their choice.
Sigh.
Yeah. I assume all the gangbangers that are shooting each other all the time have guns. Don't care about collateral damage. Of course, they don't obtain their weapons legally. Still, having a weapon for self-defense from those guys would be useless in the cases where their drive-by bullets go into a wall or window and randomly kill some innocent person that just happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Which could be said of the innocent people killed yesterday at UCC, as well.