- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 9,225
- Reaction score
- 21,723
RFG knew he had not disclosed the evidence, and had known that since 1982 or 1988. He knew that it could come out (and potentially be civilly liable for it).The exoneration above didn’t happen until several years after Gricar disappeared.
We keep hearing both arguments from people who insist Gricar didn’t meet with foul play. You argue that evidence shows he disappeared on purpose and also that he committed suicide. Which is it? He couldn’t have done both. What do you believe the preponderance of the evidence shows?
Evidence can point to different things. This points to walkaway or suicide. The financial situation points to walkaway.
The preponderance (more than 50% likely) of evidence points to walkaway. It has for a few years.