- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 2,406
- Reaction score
- 11,790
Or someone could have followed her in?
Possible but would she have allowed him access into the building?
Did she live in a doorman/concierge building?
Or someone could have followed her in?
Possible but would she have allowed him access into the building?
Did she live in a doorman/concierge building?
No, she didn't live in doorman/concierge building.
And that person might have jumped her as she was unlocking her door, she didn't have to allow him/her access into her house.
But then someone would have heard her scream or seen this perp jumping her at the front door, no?
Didn't an early article say that her building was in a very public, visible area?
But then someone would have heard her scream or seen this perp jumping her at the front door, no?
Didn't an early article say that her building was in a very public, visible area?
Latest article says she was strangled with a belt. There is a big reward for the killer.
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=8965078
bourne said "Well, unless LE states otherwise, I would not be presuming facts not in evidence. " No obvious signs of sexual assault does not mean there wasn't one. There could have been one, but it wasn't obvious. This sort of crime usually has a sexual aspect. She had lived in the neighborhood for 3 years. Was frequently seen on long jogs in the area, anyone could have followed her home and could have been watching her. He could have had a friendly "hi neighbor" type of relationship and conned his way into her home. He may have been off work due to the holiday.
She was found fully clothed and at this time police don't believe she was sexually assaulted (according to the video at that link).
Thanks, the video is an update and was not there when I first looked at the site. At the end of the video it says there may have been another man besides the boyfriend.
They could have jumped her quickly without giving her an opportunity to scream.
Wouldn't there be physical evidence of her getting jumped and assaulted upon entering her home?
As opposed to her jumped and assaulted inside the home?
On news video, police said surveillance videos of her home do not show that she was followed.
So this would suggest that her attacker(s) were inside her home already or that she let them in after she entered.
I'm curious whether there were any other ways of entering into her home besides the front door. Since the police have surveillance videos of the comings and goings in and out of her front entrance, this attacker likely went in through another entrance.
And that person might have jumped her as she was unlocking her door, she didn't have to allow him/her access into her house.
Wouldn't there be physical evidence of her getting jumped and assaulted upon entering her home?
They don't have a video of the entrance to her house. They have video of her running errands somewhere, not video of the entrance to her house.
I'm curious whether there were any other ways of entering into her home besides the front door. Since the police have surveillance videos of the comings and goings in and out of her front entrance, this attacker likely went in through another entrance.