- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,683
- Reaction score
- 4,685
First off, have a safe and enjoyable trip. 
As always, respectfully snipped.
PEF had her own car, which she retained after the Mini was purchased. EG, wife #2 got the house, but it was not under water, and RFG should have gotten something in return.
BBM.
You are correct, at least publicly.
LE has never said that they were satisfied, only that there was no large cash withdrawal.
The major problem that I have with estate planning is why didn't the family simply state it. Either TG was deliberately trying to mislead everyone that there was no estate planning or LG never bothered to tell him. That raises a red flag.
Suppose that in 2002, with his divorce settled, RFG made some major estate plans and established a trust or bought a single premium life policy or something like that. That doesn't make him look bad, at all. It make him look like a caring father. It doesn't make him look suicidal or planning to walk away either. It doesn't tell us how much money LG will get. There isn't a good reason not to release that information.
You have not answered the questions, but have shown why the questions should be raised. You are asking the right questions, IMO. That can be as important as getting the right answers. Good job!

As always, respectfully snipped.
Curious about who drove the Mini 90% of the time.
If the was RG's normal transportation, why would RG put a vehicle he drove every (or almost every) day in PF's name?
Large Income.
No assets of any consequence including no car.
No will.
Looking at the big picture, this looks quite odd. In most cases when you see this type of situation, it is an individual who owns a business that has a high liability profile.
I am divorced and have adult children and a long term partner, yet I still own property. No way I would put everything in my partners name. Possibly in my sons name.
PEF had her own car, which she retained after the Mini was purchased. EG, wife #2 got the house, but it was not under water, and RFG should have gotten something in return.
Still a large amount of income not accounted for. Even if it was into a single payment life policy, there would still be a sizable bank account balance unless the policy was purchased just before RG went missing. If that were the case, LE should have realized it was a key indicator.
I don't fully buy that LE was satisfied with his financial records. I think there were questions and a bit of head scratching, but nothing they were going to tell the public about.
BBM.
You are correct, at least publicly.
LE has never said that they were satisfied, only that there was no large cash withdrawal.
The major problem that I have with estate planning is why didn't the family simply state it. Either TG was deliberately trying to mislead everyone that there was no estate planning or LG never bothered to tell him. That raises a red flag.
Suppose that in 2002, with his divorce settled, RFG made some major estate plans and established a trust or bought a single premium life policy or something like that. That doesn't make him look bad, at all. It make him look like a caring father. It doesn't make him look suicidal or planning to walk away either. It doesn't tell us how much money LG will get. There isn't a good reason not to release that information.
You have not answered the questions, but have shown why the questions should be raised. You are asking the right questions, IMO. That can be as important as getting the right answers. Good job!
