- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,682
- Reaction score
- 4,669
First, I would note that RFG could basically have everything, in terms of known expenses/assets, if he started 2003 with zero assets. His divorce was finalized in 2001, so it is hugely unlikely he started 2003 with zero assets. He should not have had any long term debt from that period. I checked once and the house was sold for a higher price that the purchase price, so it was not underwater.
Second, there could other unknown assets out there. For example, RFG could have chosen to invest a lot of savings in US savings bonds. That would not show up in bank accounts. He could have bought gold (and would have tripled or quadrupled his investment by 2011), and all of it was sitting in a safe deposit box. That would not show up in his bank accounts either.
It is possible that RFG's estate was much larger than given.
Second, there could other unknown assets out there. For example, RFG could have chosen to invest a lot of savings in US savings bonds. That would not show up in bank accounts. He could have bought gold (and would have tripled or quadrupled his investment by 2011), and all of it was sitting in a safe deposit box. That would not show up in his bank accounts either.
It is possible that RFG's estate was much larger than given.