coloradokares
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2006
- Messages
- 1,391
- Reaction score
- 6
Well, I say he's right on. But the fact that it wasn't done with a penis means it could have been done by anybody. And for some reason, I'm not totally sold on John as being "it." He certainly gives good reason.
I will say this: a lot of people have said and will say that it couldn't be John, because he was already in his fifties and people don't just become pedophiles out of the blue, especially when they've shown interest in full-grown women.
Well, that's the key: no one becomes a PEDOPHILE out of the blue. But there's a difference between a pedophile, who is drawn sexually to children by some miswiring (whatever term you use) and a SITUATIONAL MOLESTER, who chooses his child victim because they are "available."
Listen, my brother usually doesn't know shineola about this case, but he said to me, "Guv'nor, think about this: John had lost his daughter Beth and his wife didn't look like she'd make it. JB was safe."
I said, "what do you mean?"
He said, "well, JB was six years old, right? How many six-year-olds get ovarian cancer or wreck their cars? I mean, JB wasn't going to leave him any time soon. He'd have plenty of time with her, when he might not have with a full-grown woman."
Well, even a blind squirrel will find a nut.
If memory serves, Kim Ballard claimed she was his mistress. I'm pretty sure she was a fraud.
A lot of people think Patsy was "the other woman" in his first marriage, but that's way off.
Callousness? Well, the religious people always say that it's just a body. The soul is with God now. It can't be hurt.
How many husbands? Rashomon, that's like skydiving: you won't know how you'll react until it actually happens.
ROTFLMHO I always heard it as even a blind pig finds the mud puddle!!