BigCat posted ~post 498:
To me, the biggest question is why did Curley wait TEN DAYS to meet with MM after he learned of an incident in the shower? And what did MM tell Curley and Schultz at that meeting? Since Curley and Schultz are charged with perjury, I guess the grand jury found MM more credible.
------------------------------------------------------------------
From Sara's Nov. 11 article about missed chances, McCreary said he witnessed the 2002 'incident' on the Friday night before spring break.
"It was about 9:30 at night on a Friday before spring break. McQueary testified that he came to the football building in order to drop off a pair of new sneakers and pick up recruiting tapes. Instead, he testified that he walked in on Sandusky sexually assaulting a boy, estimated to be about 10 years old, in the shower."
Was spring break was a school week long?
Did McCreary leave town during that week? Curley? Schultz?
Or JoePa, after McC talked to him, on the week-end IIRC.
Could be one or more of the people to be involved in the dialog or meeting was away from campus/traveling/out of touch for that week.
Possibly gone, wk-end plus spg-brk wk, plus wk-end 2 = 10-11 days.
That could explain a TEN DAY delay in meeting.
It's a possible explanation; neverthless, the delay was totally unacceptable. Beyond the moral deficiency of such a slow response, it was also a violation of university protocol.(http://studentaffairs.psu.edu/womenscenter/pdf/protocol.pdf) The police should have been notified immediately.