- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,682
- Reaction score
- 4,669
Last night after the verdict, there were people who expressed dismay that the Jury didn't convict on every single charge.
But Sara Ganim made the point last night that if we look at it in terms of victims, the Jury convicted on some charges for every victim, even though they tossed some out.
http://video-embed.pennlive.com/ser...AAAAQBxUw0E~,DELAM66vw4ytHzgLe6gL8tgddwTWDoX7
She said: "A couple of the counts involved victim number 2, the Mike McQueary incident in the shower. However, there was one count that was acquitted in that case. There was also one count of a "not guilty" in the case from 1998 where a boy went to the Penn State police and said he was molested in a shower. However, on both of those cases it's important to say that Jerry Sandusky was convicted of some things and also acquitted of one thing in each case.
So no victim's testimony was completely dismissed, just some charges dropped that the Jury felt weren't proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
In the case of Victim 6, there was a misdemeanor "Indecent Assault" charge. That was the sole charge he was acquitted on regarding Victim 6; he was convicted of the felonies.
The problem was that the prosecution had to show the purpose of arousing sexual desire in the person or the complainant. Victim 6 couldn't determine that.
It is explained here: http://www.centredaily.com/2011/11/19/2992124/speculative-reasons.html#storylink=cpy
I don't take a lot of comfort in this, but I said it on 11/19/11.
Had there been a conviction of the felonies in 1998-9, Sandusky would have been on Meagan's List. Oh, God!