Brefie said:Narla,
Those who do not understand the time difference, much less your relationship with your child have no business commenting.
Those who do know you a little better, however, know exactly what you are doing while missing meeting times on messenger and WS.
Hey, if anyone is getting neglected by you - it's ME!!!!!
Hard to compare Amber -- someone you don't even know -- to someone at your work.Old Broad said:Interesting discussions here.
I hope for Ambers sake and for everyone else involved, her kids, his kids and now apparently their kid, that this will be a good stable relationship.
Amber is certainly not the only woman out there to have children with different men and I'm sure she won't be the last. She does strike me as someone who has worked hard to support her children and that's more than many do. Yes she's made some choices that were not the best, but I've made some myself and hopefully she's learned from her mistakes. Some women seem to need a man in their life more than others and IMO Amber is one, I can't say that's wrong or right, I guess it's right for her, it would be wrong for me that's all I know.
A woman I work with has 3 children by 3 different fathers, never been married and the last man she was with who she thought was a "real prize" it turned out was mollesting them. She is the type who feels she "has to have a man" and stayed with him with hopes he would marry her even though he was an ass to her and her kids, very controlling but all she could see was a possibility that just maybe a man would marry her. She tried her best to not believe the mollesting was going on until it was proven by his confession that it was going on! Now her kids are in therapy, he has a court date coming up and she's doing her best to be on the prowl for the next man! If and when she ever does find someone who will marry her I believe she'll find out that getting a ring on her finger will not be the "happy ever after" story she thought it would be, some women just seem to think they have to have a man to feel complete, I don't know if it's this way for Amber or not, I just think it might because of what I read.
Old Broad
some children raised by a single parent whose mother dated a lot of guys turn out better than kids with two "perfect parents". My mother dated a lot after divorcing my dad.JBean said:I personally don't think single parents of either sex should bring others into the mix for a good long time. I can't put a number on it, but it is just another risk of loss and turmoil for the kids. They get attached, there is a break up, and it's a lot for kids to digest. I wouldn't advise bringing a dating partner into the picture until you are sure they are potentially a true keeper.IMO it takes a long time to figure that out. Always exceptions, but where kids are concerned, why not be extra cautious?Male or female, rules apply the same.
There is no one recipe that works, but IMO and as a general guideline it is better to put energy into kids not into dating. Usually, they are already dealing with a loss of some kind and usually could use the extra time and attention.
Well I doubt her kids will ask that.lilpony said:I know, I mean come on! Her kids probably will ask her..which one is my daddy..mommy! :angel:
I am not talking in extremes PFM.My post was written in general terms. .PrayersForMaura said:some children raised by a single parent whose mother dated a lot of guys turn out better than kids with two "perfect parents". My mother dated a lot after divorcing my dad.
I earned scholarships to college, a great job and am a pretty nice person. I genuinely care about people. I'm living proof of what many people here are suggesting can't happen. And, I love my step father more than my real dad. He's been more of a father to me than my own father has.
Look at the Porco family. Their son is on trial for murdering them. Look at Scott Peterson. Etc. You can have two parents and turn out way different than someone with one main parent.
Just because the shoe fits you doesn't mean everyone likes the style and has to wear it.
exactly! That's what makes it a thought provoking discussion.PrayersForMaura said:.
This discussion is all about people's own morals and trying to compare Amber against their beliefs.
One exhausts equal energy expressing the opposing view.Everyone believes differently and in the end, the energy one exhausts being so angry about Amber is not healthy.
She was actually responding to me-and I did not feel she was attacking me. She obviously does not have kids so can't understand where I am coming from.PrayersForMaura said:![]()
It's a forum, anyone can post. And I wasn't even responding to Narlacat about spending time with their kids... she chose to respond to a post I made to someone else and she chose to get defensive and take it personally.
I was merely asking a question about whaty constitutes neglecting a child.
Best to check the facts before jumping on someone's case.
PrayersForMaura said:Hard to compare Amber -- someone you don't even know -- to someone at your work.
No one is molesting Amber's kids....
Apples to oranges.
Sometimes women with three kids and one father have more issues than Amber does.
nope... i'm not expressing anger in my posts. Quite different for some people on the other side of the fence. You can very much interpret anger in some posts.JBean said:exactly! That's what makes it a thought provoking discussion.
One exhausts equal energy expressing the opposing view.That's what makes the conversation fun! I don't think anyone is really trying to influence anyone elses life choices.
I don't think she is pathetic. She didn't have her mom around a lot, as you could tell during the trial... you'd see her dad more often. Maybe she just didn't have a mother figure to help her make decisions that some deem would have been "better".julia said:I think the Scott experience would have been enough. But I guess not. Sounds like she is insecure and will take any male will have her. Pretty pathetic and showing her kids to take whatever man shows you the least bit of attention. From the sources we have heard from, 6 months preggers? She broke up with Marckovich in Nov? She gets over things quickly. If I was her and had dated SP I seriously would give up on men and move away!
thanks for posting about this, shannon! That's my best friend's name by the way ... great name!TaylorJ4 said:She was actually responding to me-and I did not feel she was attacking me. She obviously does not have kids so can't understand where I am coming from.
Do I think Amber neglects her children? I don't know enough about her to say that. My main problem with her is that she let someone she barely knew pick up her toddler from daycare unsupervised-and that man was Scott Peterson. If she wants to sleep with a different guy every night it's her business, although she needs to be careful about who she dates...
Shannon
PrayersForMaura said:Amber's kids are still young. Let's look ahead on it in 15 to 20 years and see if amber's decisions ruined her children's safety or their lives.
I'm not posting this just to you, but to many people who believe that she's endangered her children.
Seeker said:Now Amber is about 6 months pregnant with her new husbands child. Do the math.