- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 12,968
- Reaction score
- 149,000
If I recall correctly, the 1st floor was originally a porch. It was enclosed. The third floor was added on.It's what's called a split-level, but looks like an addition to the original property.
I agree completely. Had the house not been demolished by trial time, there is still no guarantee that Judge Hippler would have approved a jury of 16 to travel from Boise to Moscow, approx 300 miles, for what would very likely have been an overnight trip, to view a house that, even standing, would have been significantly different than it was the morning of the murders. Portions of walls and flooring had been removed as part of the forensic examination, which may have made it unsafe to traipse through important areas. The furniture and curtains had all been removed, and the windows had all been boarded up, all of which would have considerably affected accoustics.The number of cases where juries visit the actual crime scenes is vanishingly small. In reality, most crime scenes are released within hours, days at most, and are sanitised of the evidence of crime, either by cleaning and remodeling or by the extreme of demolition. In this case, the demolition was agreed upon after all items of evidentiary value were documented and recovered from the home. The house itself was toxic with biological materials from the homicides and chemicals from the crime scene processing. Jury members would have had to wear protective gear to enter, and the house itself was very changed from the night of the crime.
The only crime I can recall a jury actually visiting the scene in recent years was Murdaugh, which was an outdoor scene.
MOO
I believe the owners of the property sold or gifted it to the University who then decided to demolish it. There were mixed emotions from the families.If I recall correctly, the 1st floor was originally a porch. It was enclosed. The third floor was added on.
And there was some weird construction to get the 4 bedrooms, baths, and closets to work. That's why the blood leaked out of Xana's room down the side of the house. They had to build it to fit around the existing structure.
I'd like to know the story behind the condemnation of the house and who owns the property now.
Bless you, @FoxxTraxx —I had been second-guessing myself but appreciate confirmation that my memory of the Patterson book is generally accurate.Page 127 of the Patterson/Ward book may be what you remember:
On page 118 of his manifesto Elliot Rodger wrote that he planned to carry out his day of retribution scheme in November. At first he planned to do it on Halloween, because it was the ultimate party night.
''There would literally be thousands of people crowded together I could kill with ease....
But then I saw there were too many cops walking around. The Day of Retribution would have to be a normal party weekend, so I set it for some time in November 2013.''
Script theory does not seem to have value in identifying or preventing crime, but it is useful for criminals planning a crime. I think that was Kohberger's interest in procedural framework: steps taken by successful serial killers to ensure they were not arrested. Script theory in criminology analyzes:Interesting, thanks
So ' It does not currently have value in criminology' but he chose it anyway ( or was recommended it)
speculation - At De Sales, he's already fixated on committing a future crime, doing this research would both give him useful, practical pointers, and avoiding mistakes as you have emphasized.
IMO he was getting thrills from it too. His research as p/orn or fantasy.
It just reminds me of the stuff hardened paedos often do when their online conversations are revealed by LE. They wallow in sharing detail of every stage, prelude through to abuse. They've wallowed in hearing how their peers identified victims, the grooming steps and tips & techniques.
( Although admittedly I don't recall ' how you felt ' being a big feature)
The deck did extend the length of the third floor, though it was bigger off of Kaylee's room, and it could only be accessed from her room. These photos provided by poster @cujenn81, photo gallery linked to first page of every thread.Also, it is not to scale because they didn't want measurements being taken.
Since the FBI made the model I'll assume it was made from the plans that have been posted before. The measurements of the rooms etc. are on there. But that doesn't mean it was built to those exact measurements.
IIRC, Kaylee's room was much larger than Maddie's. Basically just large enough for a bed and a table/desk.
Does anyone recall that the deck went all the way across the back of the house? I thought there was only a deck off of Kaylee's room.
MOO.


Does it mean the victims/the crime will be forgotten now
because the house is no longer there?![]()
Oh My!! I had no idea he had ID cards of females, and 10 of them!
To me that is huge in terms of state of mind!!
Surely all of the ten women whose IDs he had were contacted, no brainer there.
If that doesn’t put the C in Creep, I’m not sure what does.
So how did he get these IDs? Steal them from a person’s body, purse, backpack, car, apartment?
Makes my skin crawl!
IMO
Did I miss something? 10? I thought it was two?

Fixler said that none of the ID cards that were found in a glove in a box belonged to any of the victims. Instead, one of the cards belonged to a female security guard the murderer worked with at Pleasant Valley School District back in PA, and the other belonged to another woman whose identity was not revealed. Both women were surprised that the murderer had their ID cards.
Do you think it was valuable as evidence if there was a trial, or as a memorial?
I hope the school waits several years and builds some kind of park there, for students to hold small outdoor gatherings. To me that would be a good use of it- as a celebration of their lives.
IMO
Dylan and Xana both heard something upstairs. They knew that Maddie and Kaylee were sleeping in Maddie's bedroom.My issue isn't really with the accuracy or scale of the model, but as a juror, I would absolutely want a demonstration of the acoustics of the crime scene. This model, no matter how accurately it depicts the layout of the house, does nothing to help clarify what could and could not be heard from certain locations inside the house. I can guarantee you that Ann Taylor would have exploited that fact at trial.

I thought my message was clear.
Of course, as evidence for the TRIAL.
What "memorial" in shape of this monstrous house does OP mean???
It should never have been demolished BEFORE trial IMO.
AFTER the trial - I don't care what would have happened to it.
JMO
The problem with using the empty house to test acoustics is that empty houses have echo that is not present when filled with furniture.Agreed, models are very nice-- in their place.
Unfortunately, though, the actual house would probably have been preferable. Not just for acoustics, necessarily, although that's clearly an area where the actualities won't carry over to a model. It's far preferable to have the actual house in many respects. If at some point this case had gone to trial and some juror had a question related to some particularity in the home, they could not have brought that juror TO the home since the home is gone. They could have shown this miniscule model or they could show 3D images or whatever they've retained. But it's not the real thing, is it?
This is one of the points I agree with SG on. I don't know why they tore this house down before trial, and I really do wonder if a plea bargain wasn't in the works for many months before we came to be aware of it. Monsterberger did sit there silently at his arraignment when they asked him for guilty or not guilty, that is so very long ago now.
Maybe he knew better than we did. I have no idea. But it looks to me like many parties may have known this would never reach trial, jmo.
According to the Prime documentary, it was donated by the owner to the University, and the University demolished it with the blessing of the victims' families.If I recall correctly, the 1st floor was originally a porch. It was enclosed. The third floor was added on.
And there was some weird construction to get the 4 bedrooms, baths, and closets to work. That's why the blood leaked out of Xana's room down the side of the house. They had to build it to fit around the existing structure.
I'd like to know the story behind the condemnation of the house and who owns the property now.
According to the Prime documentary, it was donated by the owner to the University, and the University demolished it with the blessing of the victims' families.
This paragraph could have possibly caught BK's attention:Wait, I'm confused...
Does it matter at all what was written on pg 118 of the original manuscript?
I thought the point was that BK had underlined pg 118 of the book or manuscript, or whatever it was, that he was reading. That is important because he underlined something that he thought was important.
It doesn't matter at all what page number it would be in the original manuscript or another edition etc---IT ONLY MATTERS WHAT IS ON PG 118 OF THE BOOK IN HIS POSSESSION.
So we need to find out exactly what book or manuscript he had underlined, or find the original case notes which discussed the underlined pages.
IMO
This is the back of the house.Also, it is not to scale because they didn't want measurements being taken.
Since the FBI made the model I'll assume it was made from the plans that have been posted before. The measurements of the rooms etc. are on there. But that doesn't mean it was built to those exact measurements.
IIRC, Kaylee's room was much larger than Maddie's. Basically just large enough for a bed and a table/desk.
Does anyone recall that the deck went all the way across the back of the house? I thought there was only a deck off of Kaylee's room.
MOO.

I thought my message was clear.
Of course, as evidence for the TRIAL.
What "memorial" in shape of this monstrous house does OP mean???
It should never have been demolished BEFORE trial IMO.
AFTER the trial - I don't care what would have happened to it.
JMO