POI - Dale Golder - #2

[coastal]

here is the church info i think you wanted.....it doesnt say Tena but it does have part of her hat name.....and also has the last name of DG girlfriend

hope that helps

http://www.turningpointolympia.com/Download_Files/DaylightPrayingTime-Guide07.pdf

there are other web sites for them as well.....

From your link:

>>>snip
"...Pray for our trustees, Rob Rice, Cynthia Webb and Mike Shelton and for
financial decisions, especially regarding the new property. We need wisdom
to excel at being good stewards.

..."Prayer requests concerning our property:

...Praise God that the site work (including sidewalk along Hawks Prairie
road, building foundation prep and parking lot) is continuing and that
we are closer to starting construction on the building. Continue to pray
for wisdom to plan for additional resources to finish our building."

...Pray for the building team as they continue with site and building plans.
Check Pastor Thomas’ blog for latest details on progress
http://turningpointbuildingproject.blogspot.com/

...The land next to our property is still on the market. Pray that God will
somehow allow us to acquire it, and if not, that he would provide us
with a good neighbor.

<<<snip

I don't need an answer here, but have the area around Hawks Prairie Road, and the land next to the church's property there, been searched?

 

[concentric]

No problem Scandi, I am just trying to establish rumor from fact. I was unable to locate any info on WW refusing a LDT, so I was simply asking if anyone had better luck than me. If he did indeed refuse, I'd sure like to know why, but I feel we need to establish the answer to the LDT first.

I think many of us who have been here reading from the beginning of Lindsey's disappearance continue to have concerns regarding WW.

 

[Jules71]

I think many of us who have been here reading from the beginning of Lindsey's disappearance continue to have concerns regarding WW.

I think JenniferO said she had the "pleasure" of meeting him at the search this past weekend. What are her thoughts/impressions of him?

 

[concentric]

I'm beginning to think that someone took her away from the McCleary area, maybe on private property. Even if LE had suspicions about someone and some area, they couldn't question or search unless they had probable cause, right?

If that person had no criminal record, then LE couldn't search, right?

 

[scandi]

I'm beginning to think that someone took her away from the McCleary area, maybe on private property. Even if LE had suspicions about someone and some area, they couldn't question or search unless they had probable cause, right?

If that person had no criminal record, then LE couldn't search, right?

Hi Concentric, I don't think they would need probable cause as in getting a SW. If LE has learned something suspicious about someone I believe they have every right to go to that person's property and converse with them, being very observant about what they notice at their property or in the home if they are invited in. Depending on how strongly LE feels, I think they can also ask the person to come down to the station to answer some questions.

Then if LE feels there is something there, they can ask a judge for a SW based on the probable cause they have. The cell phone SW was very simple I would assume. Not all SW's are as all encompassing as we saw as that involved in the recent search. That was major with many circumstantial probable causes rolled into one as I see it.

I could be wrong about all this. ;} I do think it is how the FBI works, and of course they temper the possible gain to the case as opposed to spooking someone which might deter the investigation. xox

 

[JenniferO]

I think JenniferO said she had the "pleasure" of meeting him at the search this past weekend. What are her thoughts/impressions of him?

I appreciated the fact that he came to the center and helped. Besides going out to search he also donated some supplies we needed.

Other than that I really have no opinion of him.

 

[cyberswept]

I appreciated the fact that he came to the center and helped. Besides going out to search he also donated some supplies we needed.

Other than that I really have no opinion of him.

Is this the first time he has ever shown up to search?

 

[JenniferO]

Is this the first time he has ever shown up to search?

I believe so.

He came on Saturday (he was out walking his dog and stopped to visit). He only stayed a minute and said he needed to get home.
He showed up on Sunday, went out on a very short search and then left.

 

[Sharyne]

I'm curious. If the Golders have lived there for a few generations, are they what one would consider wealthy? Do they have what would be considered "connections" if they are wealthy? TIA

 

[cyberswept]

I'm curious. If the Golders have lived there for a few generations, are they what one would consider wealthy? Do they have what would be considered "connections" if they are wealthy? TIA

From what we have seen, they would not be considered wealthy. As far as connections go, they could have lots of friends around having been in the area for many years.

There are extensive threads here that would probably answer a lot of your questions. I'd reserve a day for reading though as there is a lot. Just use the search feature and type in Lindsey Baum.

 

[Sharyne]

From what we have seen, they would not be considered wealthy. As far as connections go, they could have lots of friends around having been in the area for many years.

There are extensive threads here that would probably answer a lot of your questions. I'd reserve a day for reading though as there is a lot. Just use the search feature and type in Lindsey Baum.

Thank you. I haven't read a lot of the threads, that is true. I was doing that at another site and just got tired of reading all the rumors and nitpicking between posters. I try to just read what are considered facts and descriptions of the area and events.

 

[Knox]

I'm curious. If the Golders have lived there for a few generations, are they what one would consider wealthy? Do they have what would be considered "connections" if they are wealthy? TIA

Not sure if this is factual, but we know from APN searches that the properties (TG/CG) were listed as follows "TG ET AL". I always wondered if that meant the property was from her side of the family, not the Golders. Have no idea what TG's maiden name was, but bet Momtective knows ...

 

[lizzysf]

Not sure if this is factual, but we know from APN searches that the properties (TG/CG) were listed as follows "TG ET AL". I always wondered if that meant the property was from her side of the family, not the Golders. Have no idea what TG's maiden name was, but bet Momtective knows ...

TG's maiden name starts with a V and can be found in many searches and all the records on the property are at the WA state records site.. all passed from the "V" family name.

 

[momtective]

Not sure if this is factual, but we know from APN searches that the properties (TG/CG) were listed as follows "TG ET AL". I always wondered if that meant the property was from her side of the family, not the Golders. Have no idea what TG's maiden name was, but bet Momtective knows ...

No real wealth that I can find, they own a little property but that's about it. As for the last name I don't know if I can post it here without violating TOS. I do know it though.

 

[Knox]

Thanks lizzysf and Momtective :blowkiss:
Two super-sleuthers, those girls, YEP-YEP!!

 

[fleececreations]

Et all means that the property is in more than one or two peoples names. usually they use et call when its owned by three or more people.

 

[Knox]

Could be in lieu of a trust or the "others" don't want their names to be on a public record.

 

[scandi]

Not sure if this is factual, but we know from APN searches that the properties (TG/CG) were listed as follows "TG ET AL". I always wondered if that meant the property was from her side of the family, not the Golders. Have no idea what TG's maiden name was, but bet Momtective knows ...

I bet she does too

She always brings great info to the forum. We are so fortunate as we have many great researchers here. xox

 

[scandi]

I'm curious. If the Golders have lived there for a few generations, are they what one would consider wealthy? Do they have what would be considered "connections" if they are wealthy? TIA

Hi Sharyne, Nice to meet you, and WELCOME to WEBSLEUTHS! I don't think the Golders have been there for generations. I would say the families of the founding fathers have been which would be about 100+ years or so. They have to be 'newbies' compared to that ;}

 

[cyberswept]

Thank you. I haven't read a lot of the threads, that is true. I was doing that at another site and just got tired of reading all the rumors and nitpicking between posters. I try to just read what are considered facts and descriptions of the area and events.

The reason I joined this board is because it was not full of the drama I saw other places. It really is kept to a minimum. You won't find much of that, if any, but there is some great information and ideas on Lindsey here. The mods also do a great job of regulating the site.

Oh and welcome to the forum. Always good to have more eyes and ears on board.