Has anyone discussed the possibility that DG could have been stalking Lindsey for someone else? I mean, not a family member, but someone who convinced DG to get a young girl for him for an amount of money DG couldn't refuse?
I've thought about it Concentric...interesting take on things. I've thought many times DG could be diverting attention or covering up for another person, or not involved at all. Here's why:
DG's criminal sexual history started early - age 14. He has had 9 years to improve his mo - to become a more efficient and careful criminal. Seems to me he is still as brain deficient and grandiose as he was at 14.
DG made mistakes. Or did he?
...DG blew LE off in a high profile case - giving 3 different stories as to where he was on the night of the 26th. Stories that were checked for accuracy - he lied.
...DG stopped texting, an observable and trackable behavior, right at the time Lindsey was last seen.
...DG's car was seen and heard near the Beehive around 10p. Why was he there - perps don't hang around their own crime scene?
...DG's behavior changed after Lindsey disappeared - he didn't drive his known car around town with the same frequency. He was missed!
...The most blatant mistake was following mom Baum in the same car that was seen and heard near the spot Lindsey disappeared June 26th. Almost like he went out of his way to harass her and be caught.
Criminally lucky...criminally stupid...but not criminally intelligent.
Here's what we know about Lindsey - no crime scene, no evidence that we know of, no motive, no witnesses, and no body. Can a person with the above mentioned mistakes pull off this kind of crime?
Sure as heck can't count him out as a suspect, yet - way to many unexplained coincidences. Working in tandem or covering for another person is a distinct possibility. These thought are based on what little I know in this case - which isn't much! sorry for the length.