But don't you put aside those fears and do everything possible to FIND YOUR CHILD?
Not if you already know where they are. :twocents:
But don't you put aside those fears and do everything possible to FIND YOUR CHILD?
Not if you already know where they are. :twocents:
For?
Child neglect
Endangerment
Why is that? Is looking down and to the left code for "I'm lying"?Watched the parents interview with Dan Abrams on GMA yesterday. Abrams said he believed the parents however as I kept watching the dad look down and to the left I could not help thinking he was not being truthful.
Why is that? Is looking down and to the left code for "I'm lying"?
Well, I think we've seen quite a few good 'excuses' in this thread already, I'm not going to repeat them. I will just say again... 'cooperation' means different things to different people.
I haven't seen any good excuse for the parents failure to cooperate with LE.
The parents told Megyn Kelly in the interview that they were refusing to allow LE to re-interview the other children. I know the definition of "refuse" and "cooperation."
JMO
I agree.
But what does "cooperation" mean to KCPD & the FBI as they have been investigating the disappearance of Baby Lisa?
Based on what I've heard & read from LE these past 2 weeks, "cooperation" means meeting with LE & answering questions & assisting LE in developing leads.
According to DB, it seems that she believes that only a confession equates with cooperation.
IMO, cooperation also means providing an accurate, consistent timeline and/or an account of events that doesn't change from day to day so that LE has a solid foundation from which to work.
I think the Grand Jury will go all out and hand down an indictment for murder.
JMO
Why is that? Is looking down and to the left code for "I'm lying"?
Worked in a school, 1st, 2nd graders really repeat a lot of what they hear and see. I had one little girl describe how her mother was sleeping with a man on the couch, not the father and described in great detail what they were doing.
I also had a child standing next to her mother and said out loud "Look mommy her nails are real and pretty, yours are fake and ugly"
I don't think it's been made really clear how long LE has already spent with the children, or whether the children are traumatized right now. They're traumatized to some degree, I'm sure with their sister being missing, but I don't know how much.
The only reason, IMHO, they want to interview the kids right now is to get the kids to change what they already said. I think we can all project what the kids said - Lisa was in her crib, they didn't hear anything, didn't see anything. I think we all pretty much can agree that's what the boys apparently said.
So the goal now would be to get the kids to move OFF that statement, and say they were covering up, and they saw or heard or know something. LE doesn't have fresh questions that they just forgot to ask, and would like the chance to ask something completely different, i.e., your friend's teenage brother has a couple times been rumored to have acted inappropriately with the baby, can you give us information about that?
If they were my kids, I wouldn't want to put them through that. If there WAS something completely different to ask the kids, my guess is, they'd be open to those kind of questions.
At the VERY LEAST, if these were my kids I'd insist on a CASA volunteer being in the room, and IMMEDIATELY stopping any kind of shenanigans meant to fool the kids and trick them into agreeing their mother killed Lisa, or there is evidence of that. A half hour, no-shenanigans interview with each I might approve.
The thing is, they've lost their precious baby girl. They're trying to hold together what family they have left, and LE is quite good at coming in with big wrecking balls and destroying families in order to try to get them to turn on each other.
How to spot a liar video
http://www.ted.com/talks/pamela_meyer_how_to_spot_a_liar.html
I don't think it's been made really clear how long LE has already spent with the children, or whether the children are traumatized right now. They're traumatized to some degree, I'm sure with their sister being missing, but I don't know how much.
The only reason, IMHO, they want to interview the kids right now is to get the kids to change what they already said. I think we can all project what the kids said - Lisa was in her crib, they didn't hear anything, didn't see anything. I think we all pretty much can agree that's what the boys apparently said.
So the goal now would be to get the kids to move OFF that statement, and say they were covering up, and they saw or heard or know something. LE doesn't have fresh questions that they just forgot to ask, and would like the chance to ask something completely different, i.e., your friend's teenage brother has a couple times been rumored to have acted inappropriately with the baby, can you give us information about that?
If they were my kids, I wouldn't want to put them through that. If there WAS something completely different to ask the kids, my guess is, they'd be open to those kind of questions.
At the VERY LEAST, if these were my kids I'd insist on a CASA volunteer being in the room, and IMMEDIATELY stopping any kind of shenanigans meant to fool the kids and trick them into agreeing their mother killed Lisa, or there is evidence of that. A half hour, no-shenanigans interview with each I might approve.
The thing is, they've lost their precious baby girl. They're trying to hold together what family they have left, and LE is quite good at coming in with big wrecking balls and destroying families in order to try to get them to turn on each other.