I have no doubt she is an amazing teacher and counselor. She is very engaging and charizmatic. There is a place for that .
I do question why she testified ,if she doesn't need the money or the recognition.She said ,under oath ,that she knew NOTHING about this case.
If she knew nothing ,then it wasn't to correct what she perceived to be wrong,yet she didn't need the money or the recognition :waitasec:
She told JB that she was in London and there were people in Tallahassee that were very good,yet ,weeks later ,here she is back in FL testifying in a case she swears she knows nothing about. Curious,isn't it?