Maybe I'm confused. 
The investigative exception does not apply to information owed to the defense under the discovery rules.
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/anthony_case/020310-casey-anthony-trial-date (thank you to angelwhocares
*Prosecutors also filed a new motion asking the judge for a private closed-door meeting without the defense attorneys. Prosecutors say they have new material and information from investigators regarding the case that they dont want to go be disclosed to the public.*
what do you think this could be? any ideas?
do we know what kind of info prosecutors are allowed to with hold?
i found this very interesting :biggrin:
one thought i had was that KC was involed in some other *hinky* matter that involved someone else....and they are still investigating that crime....
I would think so, although it's probably worded very very vaguely.
Until I actually see it, I won't assume that the reports are correct that the State has asked to withhold information from the defense as well as from the public. But if those reports are correct, here are some possibly applicable portions of the disclosure rules:
(1) "If the court determines, in camera, that any police or investigative report contains irrelevant, sensitive information or information interrelated with other crimes or criminal activities and the disclosure of the contents of the police report may seriously impair law enforcement or jeopardize the investigation of those other crimes or activities, the court may prohibit or partially restrict the disclosure." However, the court may also "prohibit the state from introducing into evidence any of the foregoing
material not disclosed, so as to secure and maintain fairness in the just determination of the cause."
(2) "The court on its own initiative or on motion of counsel shall deny or
partially restrict disclosures authorized by this rule if it finds there is a substantial risk to any person of physical harm, intimidation, bribery, economic reprisals, or unnecessary annoyance or embarrassment resulting from the disclosure, that outweighs any usefulness of the disclosure to either party."
(3) "On a showing of good cause, the
court shall at any time order that specified disclosures be restricted, deferred, or exempted from discovery, that certain matters not be inquired into, that the scope of the deposition be limited to certain matters, that a deposition be sealed and after being sealed be opened only by order of the court, or make such other order as is appropriate to protect a witness from harassment, unnecessary inconvenience, or invasion of privacy, including prohibiting the taking of a deposition. All material and information to which a party is entitled, however, must be disclosed in time to permit the party to make beneficial use of it."
Very interesting ...
It seems to me a reason for delaying release of such information to the defense would be because the information pertains in some way to the defense team. Could be tied back to DC.
But for fun, it could be tied back to the zenaida myspace, which has been quiet for almost a month now.
I would think so, although it's probably worded very very vaguely.
Until I actually see it, I won't assume that the reports are correct that the State has asked to withhold information from the defense as well as from the public. But if those reports are correct, here are some possibly applicable portions of the disclosure rules:
(1) "If the court determines, in camera, that any police or investigative report contains irrelevant, sensitive information or information interrelated with other crimes or criminal activities and the disclosure of the contents of the police report may seriously impair law enforcement or jeopardize the investigation of those other crimes or activities, the court may prohibit or partially restrict the disclosure." However, the court may also "prohibit the state from introducing into evidence any of the foregoing
material not disclosed, so as to secure and maintain fairness in the just determination of the cause."
(2) "The court on its own initiative or on motion of counsel shall deny or
partially restrict disclosures authorized by this rule if it finds there is a substantial risk to any person of physical harm, intimidation, bribery, economic reprisals, or unnecessary annoyance or embarrassment resulting from the disclosure, that outweighs any usefulness of the disclosure to either party."
(3) "On a showing of good cause, the
court shall at any time order that specified disclosures be restricted, deferred, or exempted from discovery, that certain matters not be inquired into, that the scope of the deposition be limited to certain matters, that a deposition be sealed and after being sealed be opened only by order of the court, or make such other order as is appropriate to protect a witness from harassment, unnecessary inconvenience, or invasion of privacy, including prohibiting the taking of a deposition. All material and information to which a party is entitled, however, must be disclosed in time to permit the party to make beneficial use of it."
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/anthony_case/020310-casey-anthony-trial-date (thank you to angelwhocares
*Prosecutors also filed a new motion asking the judge for a private closed-door meeting without the defense attorneys. Prosecutors say they have new material and information from investigators regarding the case that they dont want to go be disclosed to the public.*
what do you think this could be? any ideas?
do we know what kind of info prosecutors are allowed to with hold?
i found this very interesting :biggrin:
one thought i had was that KC was involed in some other *hinky* matter that involved someone else....and they are still investigating that crime....
that's interesting, it would be freaky if it's ZFG or something!
(p.s. I just have to disagree with your comment there about the defense supposedly defaming RK! The defense isn't responsible for RK hanging around the remains site or the fact his ex-wife says he used to restrain her with duct tape! I don't think RK can blame the defense for those things.....
With the degree of defamation of Casey and her family that has gone on, I just have to laugh at the defense being accused of defaming anyone in this case! There's no comparison. IMO.)
that's interesting, it would be freaky if it's ZFG or something!
(p.s. I just have to disagree with your comment there about the defense supposedly defaming RK! The defense isn't responsible for RK hanging around the remains site or the fact his ex-wife says he used to restrain her with duct tape! I don't think RK can blame the defense for those things.....
With the degree of defamation of Casey and her family that has gone on, I just have to laugh at the defense being accused of defaming anyone in this case! There's no comparison. IMO.)
