TakeNote
Mother to little post it my boy wonder & Founding
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 6,187
- Reaction score
- 13
Wow! So there was urine in the bottle in addition to the chemicals or was there NO urine in the bottle? Has that been decided/proven from the docs? Awesome-I always know I can count on you guys to clear up all my musings about this urine smelling substance...
from the other thread on chloroform
posted from JWG
The smell of urine in the Crystal Light bottle
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to testing, the FBI analyst noted that the contents of the Crystal Light bottle smelled of urine (page 11512). Because it might have been urine, the question was asked of SA Savage 1) from where did the contents originate and 2) did they wish to have it tested for DNA and toxicology.
When I first read the communication log I thought that meant the substance was not tested. However, it was tested - chemically analyzed - and determined not to be urine. Therefore, DNA testing was never ordered.
Why did the FBI analyst note that the substance smelled like urine? Because two chemicals found in the substance produce odors that can be mistaken for urine:
Trimethylamine - the source of the "ammonia" smell.
Dimethyl disulfide - the source of the underlying "sulfur" / "rotten egg" smell.
But rest assured, there was no urine in that sample.
i think this means there was no urine in the bottle only smelled like it.... :banghead: