Random Thoughts and Ideas

Status
Not open for further replies.
On the SM forum there was some discussion today about the possibility that KC had had another child??? There were discussing this in the context of something Shirley had written in one of her emails. They were also mentioning that there were two ultrasound pics - one with a blue ribbon and one with a pink ribbon. I've been away from the boards for a few days...

Does anyone know what this could be about???
 
On the SM forum there was some discussion today about the possibility that KC had had another child??? There were discussing this in the context of something Shirley had written in one of her emails. They were also mentioning that there were two ultrasound pics - one with a blue ribbon and one with a pink ribbon. I've been away from the boards for a few days...

Does anyone know what this could be about???

Remember back when Cindy discovered Caylee was missing, she said something along the lines of "I can't lose another one!"

Could Casey have given birth to twins, a boy and a girl, and they only kept Caylee, giving the boy up for adoption? This is TOTAL speculation on my part, but it's a thought I've had since this ultrasound with pink and blue ribbons issue came up.
 
On the SM forum there was some discussion today about the possibility that KC had had another child??? There were discussing this in the context of something Shirley had written in one of her emails. They were also mentioning that there were two ultrasound pics - one with a blue ribbon and one with a pink ribbon. I've been away from the boards for a few days...

Does anyone know what this could be about???

When I read the emails it seemed like she was referring to if she was pregnant now CA wouldn't even know it since she didn't know the first time. It seemed like just a sarcastic comment. As far as the ultrasound pics, they are both of Caylee. IMO it is just speculation and misinterpretation of the emails.
 
Remember back when Cindy discovered Caylee was missing, she said something along the lines of "I can't lose another one!"

Could Casey have given birth to twins, a boy and a girl, and they only kept Caylee, giving the boy up for adoption? This is TOTAL speculation on my part, but it's a thought I've had since this ultrasound with pink and blue ribbons issue came up.

Hiya Janis! When did the ultrasound with a pind and blue ribbon come up??? I haven't read anything about that here? Also - Do you know what email (Shirley's) is being referred to???
 
On the SM forum there was some discussion today about the possibility that KC had had another child??? There were discussing this in the context of something Shirley had written in one of her emails. They were also mentioning that there were two ultrasound pics - one with a blue ribbon and one with a pink ribbon. I've been away from the boards for a few days...

Does anyone know what this could be about???

Hi Pink!

I've been following along over there as well. In my OPINION, it's just a red herring. In my opinion, the letter seems to answer the question "do you think KC is pg again and hiding out to keep it from the family?" Present tense, not past. The answer is "Cindy doesn't think so, but then she didn't know she was pregnant the last time."

As for the ultrasound pics, in my OPINION, doubtful. Didn't somebody over there make the very good point that they 2 pics in question could be CA's pics of LA & KC?

I think we are beginning (LOL) to make our selves nuts with the "what ifs.":crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy:

Cheers
BFMD
 
Thanksgiving night while driving to my hometown, my car began to decelerate. Eventually, it stopped and we were on the side of the road with a dead car. 1,000,000 things could have been wrong with it but we looked at the most obvious problem--my gas gauge seemed a little off. SO we went with the obvious thought that we needed to get to a gas station and fill it up. While traveling to the gas station, I analyzed every potential problem. Battery, starter, alternator, whatever. We put in a gallon of gas--BINGO!

I couldn't help but think of this case. It could have been any combination of things but it was the most obvious theory that panned out. Just like the pending trial, I had to wait until the gas was actually in the car to know for sure. Theories abound and many make sense. I am going with my gut on this one. I'll never forget the night this case was first reported on our local Orlando news. Half asleep I mumbled, "31 days, ugh, the mom did it." I can't wait for the state to prove it.

I later laughed at the ironic fact my gas guage is as fauly as Casey's.
 
When I read the emails it seemed like she was referring to if she was pregnant now CA wouldn't even know it since she didn't know the first time. It seemed like just a sarcastic comment. As far as the ultrasound pics, they are both of Caylee. IMO it is just speculation and misinterpretation of the emails.
Oh ok. I'd read those emails but I thought that I had missed something!
 
As we close out Nov. it seems that the media are finally reporting on the case in a way that offers closure. MyFox Orlando in reporting on tonight's vigil state, "The little girl was last seen on June 16, but her mother did not report her missing until July.
The toddler's body has not been recovered."

http://www.myfoxorlando.com/myfox/p...n=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=1.1.1

Interesting that this statement is made in the same mention of the vigil.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I hope it is a turning point in how this is now going to be reported with the media. I also hope that the media never again puts an innocent child's picture provided to them by The A's~KFN~M.Bart again. Why give them an outlet to lie?

What I have bolded is one of my biggest pet peeves...........The perp never reported her child missing, Cindy did.
 
Hi Pink!

I've been following along over there as well. In my OPINION, it's just a red herring. In my opinion, the letter seems to answer the question "do you think KC is pg again and hiding out to keep it from the family?" Present tense, not past. The answer is "Cindy doesn't think so, but then she didn't know she was pregnant the last time."

As for the ultrasound pics, in my OPINION, doubtful. Didn't somebody over there make the very good point that they 2 pics in question could be CA's pics of LA & KC?

I think we are beginning (LOL) to make our selves nuts with the "what ifs.":crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy:

Cheers
BFMD
I would agree with this, except for the possibility that the sonogram pics are of Casey and Lee. They didn't have those types of sonograms back in the early to mid-80's, they were just those grainy B&W types, that you could barely even make out that it was a baby. I think the sonogram pics everyone is discussing are those very vivid 3-D images, which is what you get today.
 
Hi Pink!

I've been following along over there as well. In my OPINION, it's just a red herring. In my opinion, the letter seems to answer the question "do you think KC is pg again and hiding out to keep it from the family?" Present tense, not past. The answer is "Cindy doesn't think so, but then she didn't know she was pregnant the last time."

As for the ultrasound pics, in my OPINION, doubtful. Didn't somebody over there make the very good point that they 2 pics in question could be CA's pics of LA & KC?

I think we are beginning (LOL) to make our selves nuts with the "what ifs.":crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy:

Cheers
BFMD

Hi MommyDog,

Thanks for answering. Are the ultrasound pics that are being discussed the ones that could be seen on their latest televised "house tour"??? Did they have a blue and a pink ribbon on them?
 
Oh ok. I'd read those emails but I thought that I had missed something!

I had read the speculations like you and had to go back and reread the emails cause I thought maybe I missed something too. lol:crazy:
 
Pink & Janis

I DID NOT see the show, but from what I have gathered from SM and here, yes, the pics were on the show.

As for Sonograms -- again, did not see the show, but there have been so many discussions of sonogram pics (here and there), I don't know which is which. (As for the 1980's - gave birth the same year as CA had KC and I didn't even have one! So no argument from me about the quality then!)

In my opinion, many seem to be getting into avenues of speculation that to me don't offer (me at least) any real relevence or insight. And then things start getting really goofy (as if they could get any goofier than this case:)
 
Pink & Janis

I DID NOT see the show, but from what I have gathered from SM and here, yes, the pics were on the show.

As for Sonograms -- again, did not see the show, but there have been so many discussions of sonogram pics (here and there), I don't know which is which. (As for the 1980's - gave birth the same year as CA had KC and I didn't even have one! So no argument from me about the quality then!)

In my opinion, many seem to be getting into avenues of speculation that to me don't offer (me at least) any real relevence or insight. And then things start getting really goofy (as if they could get any goofier than this case:)

BFMD,
Same here! My daughter is actually a month younger than Casey (thank god that's the ONLY thing they have in common!), and I did have a sonogram taken. To this day, I cannot see a "baby" shape there, it's just too grainy.
But the ones they take today seem like they're actually inside the womb, the detail is 3-D crystal clear. I remember seeing the sonogram pics on the A family walls, and they were the "new" type. I honestly don't remember seeing the blue and pink ribbons, though.
 
I've been away for a few days...Is it my impression or have things been a bit "quiet" since the docs came out?
 
I've been away for a few days...Is it my impression or have things been a bit "quiet" since the docs came out?

From the A-camp, you mean? Yes, it has been. I'm sure it's just a lull in the storm though, we'll probably see Cindy back to making her "media rounds" this coming week.
 
I read the computer forensics report from orange county sheriffs office and read KC's pic was on cupid.com. The site would only allow me to access the first 13 pg. Does this mean KC did all the reseaching of 🤬🤬🤬🤬 sites herself and possibly has photos found? Tell me if this has been discussed. My sometimers gets the best of me.
 
BFMD,
Same here! My daughter is actually a month younger than Casey (thank god that's the ONLY thing they have in common!), and I did have a sonogram taken. To this day, I cannot see a "baby" shape there, it's just too grainy.
But the ones they take today seem like they're actually inside the womb, the detail is 3-D crystal clear. I remember seeing the sonogram pics on the A family walls, and they were the "new" type. I honestly don't remember seeing the blue and pink ribbons, though.[/QUOTE]


Your intell is better than mine then --

As for 1986 -- brought mine into the world in mid autumn, he's a senior in college now...I think that's why this case freaked me out so much
 
From the A-camp, you mean? Yes, it has been. I'm sure it's just a lull in the storm though, we'll probably see Cindy back to making her "media rounds" this coming week.

From the A camp for sure but also on the boards...
 
I don't get it - what are we looking at here? Sunglasses are different ones? Hair is shorter? Looks like a boy with that shirt on and haircut?:waitasec: Help me out here!

I'm not getting this child in sunglasses comparison picture either. Who is MB? I know you can't use last names, but can you give me a hint please?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
292
Total visitors
380

Forum statistics

Threads
627,466
Messages
18,545,709
Members
241,300
Latest member
nia
Back
Top