You're onto an entirely different subject now.
That doesn't matter, HOTYH, because the person who wrote it was not actually talking about beheading a 6-year-old. They were just talking, period.
...the person who wrote it was not actually talking about beheading a 6-year-old.
I'm sorry but I was talking about the JBR ransom note. Which ransom note are you talking about?
Thats not what you said before. You had said that in some faiths, children are killed for the crimes of their parents. What faith is that? Do you have a single example or source?
I'm sorry, but I'm pretty sure the context of our conversation was lost somehow. What I said was 'impact is lost over time, by now nobody cares that much, Heck I don't think it would even make the headlines [if somebody came forward now and claimed responsibility].
Your answer seems to be that at least we who post here would still care, if somebody came forward now and claimed responsibility. Is this really right?
Was her handwriting checked? Exemplars, right and left handed word for word ransom note?
The problem would be that if someone came forward now (like an SFF) to claim responsibility, there might not be a way to prove it. Unless one of them matched the DNA.
Ur kidding, right? What ARE you talking about?!?
The handwriting, SBTC meaning, the missing items cord, tape, broken piece of paintbrush. Inside info on the R's house. The list of possible proofs simply goes on and on and on.
Whoever did this could prove it in a split second, if they chose to.
The handwriting is seen by many to match Patsy's. If some member of a SFF was found by reliable experts (more than one) to be a match as well that's one thing. As far as the meaning of SBTC, anyone can say it means anything.
Now if it was the missing paintbrush piece, that would be the clincher. Inside info on the house and tape/cord that matched those on the body- then I'd be moving closer to the other side of the fence.
The thing is, if someone or some group has those things in their possession, why haven't they come forward? Especially if JB's death was meant to be a strike at US business interests.
Yes, but as I said- they haven't. Why? Any thoughts?
The handwriting is seen by many to match Patsy's. If some member of a SFF was found by reliable experts (more than one) to be a match as well that's one thing. As far as the meaning of SBTC, anyone can say it means anything.
Now if it was the missing paintbrush piece, that would be the clincher. Inside info on the house and tape/cord that matched those on the body- then I'd be moving closer to the other side of the fence.
The thing is, if someone or some group has those things in their possession, why haven't they come forward? Especially if JB's death was meant to be a strike at US business interests.
Actually, if someone or some people was/were in a hurry to produce a ransom note to cover their butts, I think phrases from movies are the very words that would come to mind.IF the RN writer/writers were indeed inspired by these movies,then he/they isn't a very original,intelligent person IMO.
Actually, if someone or some people was/were in a hurry to produce a ransom note to cover their butts, I think phrases from movies are the very words that would come to mind.
But two and a half pages doesn't indicate someone in a hurry.
I saw this posted on another forum and wanted to see if anyone here has any info or thoughts.
In PMPT, it states that the movie "Nick of Time" was playing on cable at the time of JB's murder, and a guest at the White's claimed to have actually watched that movie while at the White's that day. In that movie, a 6-year old girl is kidnapped by a foreign faction and is told to "listen carefully". This seems like to much of a coincidence to NOT have inspired that note, doesn't it?
The quote is: "Pay attention. You listenin' Mr Watson" The father and daughter are taken by a man and a woman posing as cops. He is told to shoot the Governor or else they will kill his kid. Hmmmm. There'd have to be something a bit closer to the RN to have been a coincidence.
Here's your comment. If you can point me towards the report, I'd like to take a look at it.
I saw this posted on another forum and wanted to see if anyone here has any info or thoughts.
In PMPT, it states that the movie "Nick of Time" was playing on cable at the time of JB's murder, and a guest at the White's claimed to have actually watched that movie while at the White's that day. In that movie, a 6-year old girl is kidnapped by a foreign faction and is told to "listen carefully". This seems like to much of a coincidence to NOT have inspired that note, doesn't it?