sissi said:
I don't believe that Burke owned hi tecs with a compass, however he could have owned any brand of "compass shoe". Something about the building of the "shoe story" never rang true.
sissi,
Both John and Patsy deny, by way of amnesia and obfuscations, that Burke owned Hi-Tec boots, but they are obviously lying to shield Burke from this incriminating evidence. (A Hi-Tec boot logo imprint was found just one foot from JonBenet's body in the basement.) But Burke himself admitted to the grand jury that he owned Hi-Tecs, and they had a compass built into the shoestrings. Here's the Q's and A's from the 2000 interviews in Atlanta:
Q. "We have been provided, and again, one of the sources of this information is confidential grand jury material I can tell you, but we have been provided information from two sources that your son Burke, prior to the murder of your daughter, owned and wore Hi-Tec boots that had a compass on them, which makes them distinctive. Do you recall Burke having boots that had a compass on the laces?"
JOHN RAMSEY: "Vaguely. I don't know if they were boots or tennis shoes."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Q. "I will state this as a fact. There are two people who have provided us with information, includidng your son, that he owned Hi-Tec shoes prior to the murder of your daughter."
(numerous interruptions by Lin Wood)
Q. "Fleet Junior also says that he had Hi-Tec shoes."
PATSY RAMSEY: "Okay. Is, are you talking like Hi-Tec like -- ?"
(From this point the fake amnesia and the obfuscations regarding the Hi-Tec boots went on and on for question after question, along with frequent long-winded interruptions by Lin Wood.)
The Ramseys are denying something that their son Burke and Fleet White III have plainly admitted to.
BlueCrab