Reports of New Casey Anthony Video Diary Surface on Web #2

[Patty G]

I had also read on earlier tweets that FCA's boyfriend was married and had kids. I wonder if that is RB or is that someone else?

Who is RB? I missed that one.

 

[katydid23]

Who is RB? I missed that one.

Ignore ME. I confused the initials with the 'alias' he had used previously. I am confuzzled.

 

[Thinker Belle]

Thanks. I have too and I know theres a couple on there that I've never seen. That's one thing that makes me think it really is him. Another thing is that I have a screen capture from someone twitting to RH about contacting JB's firm and how KC has a possible book deal and to be careful, and that twitter person uses the same profile pic as "Yee" on FB. I can't see the twitter name because it is blacked out and the profile pic has an "X" across it, but it is clearly the same as the profile pic used by "Yee".

Now that I look at it again, there is definitely a picture of Caylee, and also one of Caylee and Casey toward the end that I don't remember seeing.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

I think RB and RH are actually the same person. He apparently used two names at one point.

I heard that Drew and Rob H were the same person. Where does RB come from?

 

[Spice]

Thanks. I have too and I know theres a couple on there that I've never seen. That's one thing that makes me think it really is him. Another thing is that I have a screen capture from someone twitting to RH about contacting JB's firm and how KC has a possible book deal and to be careful, and that twitter person uses the same profile pic as "Yee" on FB. I can't see the twitter name because it is blacked out and the profile pic has an "X" across it, but it is clearly the same as the profile pic used by "Yee".

There is one of Caylee in kind of an adult pose on the beach that I have never seen before, one of her jumping on the bed with her hands up, (have never seen it) and one with kind of groucho marx-esque glasses on that I have never ever seen. Everything else has been published ad nauseum...but there are new ones on there ChefMom. I agree.

Who would have access to unpublished photos of Caylee? Especially when they seem to fetch so much money? Only a relative.

 

[Talina]

Ignore ME. I confused the initials with the 'alias' he had used previously. I am confuzzled.

:floorlaugh: Now with the slow day it has been, I see no reason for any confusion.

 

[Dignity4Victims]

Ignore ME. I confused the initials with the 'alias' he had used previously. I am confuzzled.

I think you were referring to the RH/DH switcheroo.

It's easy to get confuzzled with anything "Anthony".

 

[LolaMoon08]

All we need is for Curtis to file another motion and offer up some new information on Casey's Virginia to make all of this make sense. :floorlaugh:

 

[dilbert]

There was an article earlier than that and I thought he had confirmed the video. I'm going to go look for it now.

In any event, his name is definitely confirmed and his tweets today and his posts do not deny he had the video. He even said on his posts yesterday that he had more video and audio that he would be turning over to his attorney once he met with him. Then the next we know, we are seeing a statement come out in media from his attorney that he has met with his client, Rob Henson. I don't believe in that strong of a coincidence.

IMO

ETA: link to article from yesterday http://fox4kc.com/2012/01/06/olathe-man-at-center-of-casey-anthony-youtube-video-furor/

Well technically, his lawyer did not confirm or deny RH is the source of the videos, all he confirmed is that he's done nothing illegal. He declined to comment on what RH has said online about the videos.

 

[Aedrys]

Boy oh boy, considering everything going on this weekend, I'm thinking Monday or next week even should be interesting!

 

[Well Done 99]

There was an article earlier than that and I thought he had confirmed the video. I'm going to go look for it now.

In any event, his name is definitely confirmed and his tweets today and his posts do not deny he had the video. He even said on his posts yesterday that he had more video and audio that he would be turning over to his attorney once he met with him. Then the next we know, we are seeing a statement come out in media from his attorney that he has met with his client, Rob Henson. I don't believe in that strong of a coincidence.

IMO

ETA: link to article from yesterday http://fox4kc.com/2012/01/06/olathe-man-at-center-of-casey-anthony-youtube-video-furor/

The attorney does not expect his client will be arrested.
We should hope not! Half the kids in the world have posted videos on YouTube which originally at least partially came from elsewhere or someone else.
Please don't tell us this is going to be yet another claim of 'Casey Anthony - Victim'

 

[Deleted member 39678]

All we need is for Curtis to file another motion and offer up some new information on Casey's Virginia to make all of this make sense. :floorlaugh:

I thought he said it was KC's virgina. Virginia with a capital V is a U.S.state.

 

[Sherbie]

Reached by phone on Saturday, Hensley's attorney Curtis Sample declined to confirm or deny whether his client was the source of the videos.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...y-anthony-video-leak-20120107,0,3215826.story

Thanks, dilbert! From the article:

"Reached by phone on Saturday, Hensley's attorney Curtis Sample declined to confirm or deny whether his client was the source of the videos."

If his client weren't the source of the videos, I can't imagine why he wouldn't deny any such claims. He may well be the source. How he (or whoever is the source) came to possess the videos is far more interesting to me than who that someone is.

 

[Aedrys]

The attorney does not expect his client will be arrested.
We should hope not! Half the kids in the world have posted videos on YouTube which originally at least partially came from elsewhere or someone else.

Well, I just hope he's not on probation either because having contact with Casey would be a violation of probation! That's if he's had contact, which there seems to be evidence that he has. I don't think this is some innocent person who happened to find a Casey vid on Youtube.

 

[dilbert]

The attorney does not expect his client will be arrested.
We should hope not! Half the kids in the world have posted videos on YouTube which originally at least partially came from elsewhere or someone else.

If you read the other article, he's talking about [not] being arrested for hacking I think. (since he did not hack Casey's computer)

 

[Dignity4Victims]

Well technically, his lawyer did not confirm or deny RH is the source of the videos, all he confirmed is that he's done nothing illegal. He declined to comment on what RH has said online about the videos.

The problem is, either his Attorney neglected to tell him to put a tight lid on it from this point forward, or, RH is just not bright enough to take heed, because he's still flappin' his yapper 240 today!

 

[chefmom]

So, let's see. JB and KC have been unsuccessful at getting any "deals" since the verdict because of KC being "toxic". KC has hooked up with some guy, RH, who may or may not be JB's cousin, and has been video-chatting or something with him. Minimally, she sent him a nudey pic. Possibly, she entrusted him with video-logs of her talking. According to this RH, KC was going to fire JB if he didn't get her a deal by the end of the year and take matters into her own hands. New Year comes and we are hit with the KC Video Diary by Ronco. JB will not return calls from the media, which is unheard of, and KC is claiming her computer was hacked, while CM threatens legal action against the phantom hacker. Now, this RH, who appears to be a convicetd felon himself, has lawyered up. Interesting!

So, my question is this? Who is playing who here? Is this KC getting back at JB for not getting her a deal and it is possibly going to backfire on her?

Or is this JB playing KC by having someone he knows, possibly even related to, get in close to KC and thwart her plans to make money without him? Hmmmm!

All, just getting curiouser and curiouser!

 

[SyraKelly]

The naked photo was likely taken right after Casey's release, but it had never surfaced online until this past week.

Oh, and Casey was attentive enough to make sure her wrists were dressed in her usual cheap bracelet garb for her naked photo. :giggle:

it is easy to find and I am not good with computers!!!

 

[Dignity4Victims]

Thanks, dilbert! From the article:

"Reached by phone on Saturday, Hensley's attorney Curtis Sample declined to confirm or deny whether his client was the source of the videos."

If his client weren't the source of the videos, I can't imagine why he wouldn't deny any such claims. He may well be the source. How he (or whoever is the source) came to possess the videos is far more interesting to me than who that someone is.

I agree!

But I doubt he'll ever come clean about that because if he admits that Casey gave them to him freely, he's jeopardizing her, and if you've read anything at all this guy has to say, he's all about "protecting Casey".

If he admits he hacked them, which I don't believe he did at this point, well, you know the rest.

So I doubt we'll ever know the truth of it. Don't forget, this pertains to Casey, the Masterliar on Earth!

 

[dilbert]

The problem is, either his Attorney neglected to tell him to put a tight lid on it from this point forward, or, RH is just not bright enough to take heed, because he's still flappin' his yapper 240 today!

LOL I know, was just trying to correct an error, his lawyer did not confirm or deny he's the source. It sure looks like he is though.