This started again on Nov. 10th! What have I been doing. I guess I have a lot of catching up to do.
Ahem...it started on October 20th.

This started again on Nov. 10th! What have I been doing. I guess I have a lot of catching up to do.
Hmmmm . . . . shouldn't Dr. MF "Clinic for Sexualities" have pulled out her M.E.G.A. assessment for adolescent sexually aggressive youth and done an analysis (not an assessment or diagnosis) on Jodi if this were true?
This started again on Nov. 10th! What have I been doing. I guess I have a lot of catching up to do.
Yes I agree with your first paragraph. It was the only word I could think of for theat the moment. A child would be experimenting I guess. Look, I wouldn't believe her no matter what she said now! She lies every time she opens her mouth.
As for the second paragraph, I am sick of any stories she and her attorneys come up with.
just sentence her already!
Really? Sealing again? They need another judge in Arizona. Fast.Well, you bring up a good point. He's talking about public scrutiny. I wonder if the judge can/might seal all records for the appeal(s) as well, especially given Nurmi's paranoia (outrage) about 'scrutiny' and the murderer's obsession with successfully manipulating the justice system at will.
This started again on Nov. 10th! What have I been doing. I guess I have a lot of catching up to do.
I don't think it's her daughter. That would mean she was abused as a child and she would have loved to bring that up to appear more of a damaged victim.
1. She can try. I don't think it will work unless everything she said was already said in the guilt phase--in which case JM can play the tape from his previous cross. If JM agreed to accept "striking from the record" as a remedy, it could happen, but otherwise I think she's waived her right to refuse to testify and will have to undergo cross. Of course, maybe it wasn't testimony as a witness but merely her allocution being taken out of order--in which case there would be no cross.
2. See above.![]()
"The appeals court did not include an opinion on Wednesday, but the document stated the court would do so in "due course.""
Ok, I think we're missing a second page saying the court would give an opinion, the way AZL said would happen.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...-jodi-arias-media-shut-out-reversed/19546851/
Ahem...it started on October 20th.![]()
When is the next trial date?
Have any of the previous cast of characters for the defense testified or are they all gone?