Yeah, just saw this on state vs JA. She's explaining this in the chat but I missed it. She stands by her story that it had to do with a January commitment. But it probably had more to do with this arrest and a court appearance and she outed the arrest. Agree with JSR that when Juan found out he was probably in agreement with her dismissal. :facepalm: Strange woman...
Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/05-08 In recess
- Thread starter LambChop
- Start date
-
GA GA - Worth Co. BlkMale ~40 UP11098, dismembered torso in field Sep'88- Latest: The4TierBridge
- Status
Yeah, just saw this on state vs JA. She's explaining this in the chat but I missed it. She stands by her story that it had to do with a January commitment. But it probably had more to do with this arrest and a court appearance and she outed the arrest. Agree with JSR that when Juan found out he was probably in agreement with her dismissal. :facepalm: Strange woman...
Truth Detector
Your Humble Observer
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2012
- Messages
- 5,393
- Reaction score
- 27
AngelWings444
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 5,066
- Reaction score
- 7
I haven't believed a word out of Juror # 3's mouth since the beginning. MeeBee, your first instinct was correct! First, she acts all high and mighty. Then tonight, she speaks again and says she really was leaning towards the State. Sure, after you read all the negative stuff said about you on the Internet. Seeking out attention is only going to hurt her and this trial. Maybe that is why Juan, JSS, and the defense were laughing today. I really wish all the "other" stuff would go away and we could get this trial DONE!
AngelWings444
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 5,066
- Reaction score
- 7
Ask her why Ms. Intengrity was also arrested for a BAD CHECK. Oh, the characters in the trial. So glad she is gone!
dog.gone.cute
Kyron Horman - Missing Since 6-4-10
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 15,653
- Reaction score
- 1,949
BBM: Good point ...
I think that the DT knows which juror submitted questions because CMJA is STALKING the jurors !
No doubt, CMJA is continuing to make eye contact with the jurors when they come and go just like she did during the trial and first penalty phase ...
And no doubt, she is watching them like a hawk when they are listening to testimony, and then she passes the info to her DT ... and then you have the mitigation person and momma to watch the jury also ...
:gaah: Creepy !
Hatfield
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 17,014
- Reaction score
- 59,147
OMG. Of course the reason she was booted was this arrest.
So she writes bad checks and lies about the reason why she was booted from the trial. Probably good to have her off the case. Of course the courtroom didnt tell her the real reason but she is only fooling herself if she thinks its because of 1 lousy day she had a conflict in Jan. Of course it was because of being arrested for the writing of bad checks.
The court doesnt want potential criminals being part of juries.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 28,776
- Reaction score
- 44,684
Can't find her original post to quote, but I'm a lifelong Californian. We go on Daylight Savings Time from April to November- Spring to Fall. Just got off it and it sucks. Gets dark at 4:00 in Dec. I hate it!!! Wish we always stayed on it, I like my twilight summer evenings!
Pssst! FYI, real Californians don't call it Cali.
I think some others, Hope4More and others, were even more correct. I thought she was genuine just was worried about her. Something did rub me the wrong way. She's all talk about integrity but runs to Jen to get her story out before her arrest goes public. I thought it interesting that she kept saying the reason she was let go, making sure everyone understood she was excused not dismissed. It was obvious she wanted that known. Still thought she just wanted people to know she did nothing wrong. Protesting too much, maybe. Now we know the real truth.
Still think there's nothing wrong with talking to the press. But I question her intentions now. Still regret her not making it on the jury. But it's good she's gone. She must not have revealed her arrest until she was forced to reveal a court appearance due to the trial running long.
:sigh:
That's what I didn't understand! Why would they boot her over one day?! In the past they'd scheduled days around the jurors' schedules. She was obviously not telling the whole story.
Charterhouse
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2012
- Messages
- 908
- Reaction score
- 3
How do I search here for a post if I can't remember which thread? I'm looking for the.post about someone's family member knowing JSS and commenting how nice she is......
Hi Hope, I think it was me. My neighbor worked with JSS.
Yup it was Gibb and it's too bad because he would have ended up being the foreman and had he been on the jury instead of the last foreman this retrial would not be taking place.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 28,776
- Reaction score
- 44,684
Happens in April. Spring forward, Fall back, that's how we remember it. I hate going off Daylight Savings Time!!!
I thought he was let go because when he was arrested he revealed that he was on the JA jury to the cops?
She is saying she did tell the court about the arrest and they were fine with it. It was only when the court appearance and the schedule conflict came up that they let her go. Maybe, in the end, it was just a combination of things. Maybe they didn't want it to become more of an issue than it was. Or maybe she's not being truthful...
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 28,776
- Reaction score
- 44,684
He's also pretty stupid to think that Spybot hides the registry from other users rather than cleaning it up!!!
WhoaIsMe
Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 930
- Reaction score
- 3
Wow!
So I just got finished listening to juror 3's q and a interview. It was amazing but also disappointing. She was a little more comfortable revealing more of her opinion without revealing TOO much. Disappointing because I have CATEGORICALLY changed my mind about her. She was onto Jodi and I think the post release researche she has done has confirmed what she was feeling about her. She would have voted for death, I think.
First off, she did not ask to be dismissed. They were told the trial was running long and the jury was asked to give dates that might be in conflict for them. She had ONE DAY in January and she was trying to reschedule (she had already rescheduled two previous commitments). Not good enough. She was let go. The defense's doing, no doubt.
I think she likes Juan. She said she liked that, while the defense covered so much in the hopes of planting doubts, Juan would bring it back to the important things. That's also what I love about him. She said his treatment of Fonseca was brilliant, in that he didn't cut her off when she would get feisty. He let her show herand that spoke to this juror.
Speaking of Fonseca, she took a dig at her use of the word "voluminous." She found Fonseca unprofessional. It's exactly like we've said, when you act that way you reveal that it is personal for you and the only reason to act like that is if you are hiding something or you've some something wrong. Fonseca focused on the wrong things i.e. Too much victim bashing. I do not think that resonated with her.
She was asked about her trigger question. I think this was something that was bothering her. She KNOWS there is a trigger and she KNOWS Jodi is the only one who knows what it was. She watched Jodi's testimony and was disappointed to find, like us, that Jodi never revealed it and it was never discovered.
She found some of Jodi's behaviors telling. Changes of demeanor in court and the head stand in her interrogation, to name a couple. She also found it telling that in her first sentencing no one came forward to testify for her. She also found Jodi's reactions to the sex call that SHE recorded "ironic" (covering her ears, for instance). She was also very surprised to learn the defense has tried to quit on her.
She was asked what stuck out about the two opening statements. For Juan-he said at the end there are NO mitigators for her (she also said these mitigators did not negate the nature of the crime though there were two that she was focused on). It was objected to by Nurmi but it sticks in your mind. For Nurmi-nothing.
She believes it is Nurmi's goal to get jurors to drop off (and here, it seems like it was a premeditated effort, IMO). She said she believes he is "underestimating" this jury. She says the more he tries to get them removed the more pissed off and determined they will become to stick around. That's refreshing.
She was asked if she believes Jodi staked Travis: "ABSOLUTELY."
She was given NO admonitions about talking to the media or about what she can say. What she refuses to discuss is her choice. She doesn't want it to help anyone out.
She believes the state wanted her on jury.
In her opinion, the issue of Travis watching
Her BF is confused at how long this is going on and at some of the DT's strategies.
So that's what I got. It was a great interview but at the same time disappointing. Her dismissal is frustrating as hell. Nurmi can delay the trial for days, weeks, but one juror has one day that is in contention and she's gone? Has JSS gone mad? With how long this is going to go, she should not be too gung no about releasing jurors over nothing. IMO.
Thank you for posting your thoughts on this interview. I didn't know there was another one today. I wonder if Juan fought for her. It really sucks that they would not accommodate her one day when the DT have spent the last month (is it two already?) jerking everyone in court around every chance they get. Seems like Nurmi would have been all for it. He could have had a free day from CMJA's face. He could have just reminded his secretary to hang up if it's her on the phone, and had some peace.
As an aside, I have been thinking about how much she made out in her letter to JSS re:firing Nurmi, that she hates Nurmi and how much he really sucks at his job and how much he loathes her, and the part of my mind that has learned to distrust everything she says and to try to see the motive behind her words wonders if that wasn't all a ploy. Setting the stage to represent herself for that short period of time, to do whatever it was that Nurmi or Willmott didn't want to be caught doing.
This trail is making me into a very suspicious minded person.
dog.gone.cute
Kyron Horman - Missing Since 6-4-10
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 15,653
- Reaction score
- 1,949
She wrote the bad check in 2006 and was arrested on a warrant over thanksgiving. She let the court know on her questionnaire about the check. She now has a court date. That's what prompted the removal. Juan and the defense probably both wanted her gone.
SW broke the news.
SW broke the news.
04009margaret
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,406
- Reaction score
- 97
Doppelgänger
- Status
Similar threads
