Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/05-08 In recess

[TartLemon]

IMO, JA will never see the light of free day. One of the hardest things for me to accept about this whole process right now is that Jodi Arias is basking in the knowledge that she is in control. This brutal butcher is running the show and it makes her HAPPY. JA has compartmentalized the heinous crime and separated it from the performance she is playing now.

Jodi Arias is a psycho who WILL kill again if allowed to be free.

 

[YESorNO]

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/09/2014 8:00 AM

12/02/2014

TRIAL MINUTE ENTRY
DAY 21

LET THE RECORD REFLECT on 11/25/14 Exhibits 233, 242, 242.001, 406, 734 and 735
were temporarily released to the Defense and returned today....

Court and counsel discuss News Organizations’ Request for Order Unsealing Transcript
of October 30, 2014 Witness Testimony and Related Proceedings at a bench conference.

IT IS ORDERED unsealing the transcript and directing the Court Reporter, Marla
Arnold, to prepare a written transcript of the proceedings, not to be distributed without further
order of the Court...

Dr. L.C. Miccio Fonseca, having previously been sworn, testifies further.

Defense exhibit 758 is marked for identification.
Defense exhibit 758 is received in evidence over the State’s objection.
Defense exhibit 440 is offered in evidence and not admitted due to the State’s objection.
Defense exhibit 440 is split and Defense exhibit 440.001 is received in evidence.
State’s exhibit 759 is marked for identification.
State’s exhibit 759 is received in evidence over the State’s objection.
State’s exhibit 760 is marked for identification....

Court and counsel discuss juror questions 18 through 30 at a bench conference....

Juror questions 18 through 27 are asked of the witness. Juror questions 28 through 30 are
not asked of the witness due to the objections of counsel.

FILED: Juror questions 18 through 30.

At a bench conference, Defense counsel moves for a mistrial for reasons as stated on the
record.

IT IS ORDERED denying Defense counsel’s Motion for a Mistrial....

Court and counsel meet in chambers outside the presence of the jury. The Defendant is
present. Victim’s representatives are present....

Juror #3 is present and questioned by Court and counsel.

For reasons as stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED excusing Juror #3 from further consideration of this cause...

Dr. L.C. Miccio Fonseca resumes the witness stand and testifies further.
The witness is excused but subject to recall....

Defense counsel is directed to bring the two drives given to them by the Defense to the
evidentiary hearing set for Friday, 12/04/2014.

Defense exhibits 734 and 735 are temporarily released to Defense counsel to be returned
to the clerk on 12/08/2014...

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/122014/m6605479.pdf

 

[Luvrosco]

IMO, JA will never see the light of free day. One of the hardest things for me to accept about this whole process right now is that Jodi Arias is basking in the knowledge that she is in control. This brutal butcher is running the show and it makes her HAPPY. JA has compartmentalized the heinous crime and separated it from the performance she is playing now.

Jodi Arias is a psycho who WILL kill again if allowed to be free.

I agree with everything you said, and I pray that JSS doesn't believe some of her BS and give her LWP.

 

[lilyet]

Does anyone one know if this is a credible tweet.
@tarakelley320 @JarrettSeltzer A #JodiArias court officer was fired for saying Juan should be stabbed 27 times. YOU BET YOUR LIFE insiders



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting. I am so pro-state that I cannot fathom how anyone can find Juan anything but incredible at his job and a great prosecutor. He apparently has a "hate club" whether this tweet is true or not. I don't get it.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Interesting. I am so pro-state that I cannot fathom how anyone can find Juan anything but incredible at his job and a great prosecutor. He apparently has a "hate club" whether this tweet is true or not. I don't get it.

I doubt this is true, but if it is, I would hope the fired court officer was Maria. JMO.

ETA: I am sure Juan has his detractors. If I was guilty of a crime I wouldn't want that bulldog on my trail. LOL. But the guy is brilliant in what he does. I just keep hoping that after the trials on his schedule at the moment are completed, he will retire to some sunny far away island to relax. Can you imagine the toll it takes on him to eat/sleep/drink the Arias case 24/7? That is hard on the body and soul to have a case like this consume you. He has had to do this with many cases. My heart really goes out to him.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/09/2014 8:00 AM

12/02/2014

TRIAL MINUTE ENTRY
DAY 21

LET THE RECORD REFLECT on 11/25/14 Exhibits 233, 242, 242.001, 406, 734 and 735
were temporarily released to the Defense and returned today....

Court and counsel discuss News Organizations’ Request for Order Unsealing Transcript
of October 30, 2014 Witness Testimony and Related Proceedings at a bench conference.

IT IS ORDERED unsealing the transcript and directing the Court Reporter, Marla
Arnold, to prepare a written transcript of the proceedings, not to be distributed without further
order of the Court...

Dr. L.C. Miccio Fonseca, having previously been sworn, testifies further.

Defense exhibit 758 is marked for identification.
Defense exhibit 758 is received in evidence over the State’s objection.
Defense exhibit 440 is offered in evidence and not admitted due to the State’s objection.
Defense exhibit 440 is split and Defense exhibit 440.001 is received in evidence.
State’s exhibit 759 is marked for identification.
State’s exhibit 759 is received in evidence over the State’s objection.
State’s exhibit 760 is marked for identification....

Court and counsel discuss juror questions 18 through 30 at a bench conference....

Juror questions 18 through 27 are asked of the witness. Juror questions 28 through 30 are
not asked of the witness due to the objections of counsel.

FILED: Juror questions 18 through 30.

At a bench conference, Defense counsel moves for a mistrial for reasons as stated on the
record.

IT IS ORDERED denying Defense counsel’s Motion for a Mistrial....

Court and counsel meet in chambers outside the presence of the jury. The Defendant is
present. Victim’s representatives are present....

Juror #3 is present and questioned by Court and counsel.

For reasons as stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED excusing Juror #3 from further consideration of this cause...

Dr. L.C. Miccio Fonseca resumes the witness stand and testifies further.
The witness is excused but subject to recall....

Defense counsel is directed to bring the two drives given to them by the Defense to the
evidentiary hearing set for Friday, 12/04/2014.

Defense exhibits 734 and 735 are temporarily released to Defense counsel to be returned
to the clerk on 12/08/2014...

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/122014/m6605479.pdf

Thanks Yes or No for always posting these court minutes. I am glad the court reporter at least is preparing the transcript for release. Ah, but the judge then decided not to release it yet. Amazing how she toys with justice.

 

[Love Never Fails]

I have a lot of catching up to do, it seems. Tomorrow. Should be asleep, but a suspicion is really bugging me.

Im beginning to think the computer skirmish was never a good faith complaint against JM. That Nurmi has known from the beginning that the files were deleted accidentally.

I think its possible Nurmi overreached as strategy, and that his plan all along is to get those forged pedo letters into evidence.

Evertything he does is calculated.

 

[ohreally]

Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court
*** Electronically Filed ***
12/09/2014 8:00 AM

12/02/2014

TRIAL MINUTE ENTRY
DAY 21

LET THE RECORD REFLECT on 11/25/14 Exhibits 233, 242, 242.001, 406, 734 and 735
were temporarily released to the Defense and returned today....

Court and counsel discuss News Organizations’ Request for Order Unsealing Transcript
of October 30, 2014 Witness Testimony and Related Proceedings at a bench conference.

IT IS ORDERED unsealing the transcript and directing the Court Reporter, Marla
Arnold, to prepare a written transcript of the proceedings, not to be distributed without further
order of the Court...

Dr. L.C. Miccio Fonseca, having previously been sworn, testifies further.

Defense exhibit 758 is marked for identification.
Defense exhibit 758 is received in evidence over the State’s objection.
Defense exhibit 440 is offered in evidence and not admitted due to the State’s objection.
Defense exhibit 440 is split and Defense exhibit 440.001 is received in evidence.
State’s exhibit 759 is marked for identification.
State’s exhibit 759 is received in evidence over the State’s objection.
State’s exhibit 760 is marked for identification....

Court and counsel discuss juror questions 18 through 30 at a bench conference....

Juror questions 18 through 27 are asked of the witness. Juror questions 28 through 30 are
not asked of the witness due to the objections of counsel.

FILED: Juror questions 18 through 30.

At a bench conference, Defense counsel moves for a mistrial for reasons as stated on the
record.

IT IS ORDERED denying Defense counsel’s Motion for a Mistrial....

Court and counsel meet in chambers outside the presence of the jury. The Defendant is
present. Victim’s representatives are present....

Juror #3 is present and questioned by Court and counsel.

For reasons as stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED excusing Juror #3 from further consideration of this cause...

Dr. L.C. Miccio Fonseca resumes the witness stand and testifies further.
The witness is excused but subject to recall....

Defense counsel is directed to bring the two drives given to them by the Defense to the
evidentiary hearing set for Friday, 12/04/2014.

Defense exhibits 734 and 735 are temporarily released to Defense counsel to be returned
to the clerk on 12/08/2014...

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/122014/m6605479.pdf

Haha, I think this is so funny. When the transcript is released I believe we will get to read word for word what went on in the courtroom, not just tweets. We will actually know more of the 'secret' testimony than the open court testimony. Hopefully JS is just waiting on the COA written ruling to release it. Talk about a backfire Jodi.

 

[Dmacky]

If I am reading it correctly, she had a prior misdemeanor that she disclosed to the court and this new arrest is the one for the bad check, on a joint account, with her ex. Didn't she have a BF who was a defense attorney. I guess he can help her out now. There is NO way the prosecution knew of this bad check and pending charges when they agreed to have her on the jury. It's making sense now.

That's what I was thinking. Isn't she the psychologist ? Or am I confused.

 

[grammieto5]

Thank you for this. It helps me have a little hope that this fiasco might just get straightened out. And to be honest, I think if JSS were as off the wall as she appears to me right now, her superior might have stepped in. But s/he has not so maybe there is something to this notion that JSS has not totally lost her mind.

I will try to refrain from speaking mine so freely. Again, thanks. And to you too, LinasK.

Well I for one hope you never refrain from speaking freely!

 

[MeeBee]

I hate to ask and I do look all acronyms that I do not know but this one has me stumped. Who is SW??? I guess I will be embarrassed when I learn, huh? This Juror #3 situation still quite strange...this story. I have been reading on some other web sites in my search for identity of SW and some 'stories' are getting weird. Such as DT set her up, why would 8 yrs go by without any follow up, really how do 'they' find out who is writing these so called anonymous juror questions (or am I being that naive?). I still "stand by" my prior versed own opinion that Juror #3 should have been up front with this arrest on Nov 28 2014 on the first day she was interviewed.
TIA.

ETA
1. Okay SW is Sharon Weber and now I will have to sleuth out what she has done as a JA supporter.
2. Someone did apparently leak on purpose after she answered interview questions X2 separate days.
3. Still no answer related to the 8 yrs passage of time for alleged bad check written allegedly by ex-hubby.
4. How does the DT find out who writes the anonymous juror questions (or am I being that naive?)
5. Now am of opinion Juror #3 should have kept quiet until after trial ended

Most people seemed to know that she was asking the bulk of the questions, including Jen. She submitted many of them and when they compared handwriting, it probably became obvious which questions were hers.

 

[Steve44]

I have a lot of catching up to do, it seems. Tomorrow. Should be asleep, but a suspicion is really bugging me.

Im beginning to think the computer skirmish was never a good faith complaint against JM. That Nurmi has known from the beginning that the files were deleted accidentally.

I think its possible Nurmi overreached as strategy, and that his plan all along is to get those forged pedo letters into evidence.

I realize the rules for evidence are different in this phase, but I don't think that's what he's doing since Juan said he can prove they were forged. I think he is trying to get computer in in lieu of the letters, and hoping to be able to imply some of it may have been child .

 

[MeeBee]

I doubt this is true, but if it is, I would hope the fired court officer was Maria. JMO.

ETA: I am sure Juan has his detractors. If I was guilty of a crime I wouldn't want that bulldog on my trail. LOL. But the guy is brilliant in what he does. I just keep hoping that after the trials on his schedule at the moment are completed, he will retire to some sunny far away island to relax. Can you imagine the toll it takes on him to eat/sleep/drink the Arias case 24/7? That is hard on the body and soul to have a case like this consume you. He has had to do this with many cases. My heart really goes out to him.

I think this was something that happened a while ago because this is one of those things the defense claim Det. Flores' wife was going around talking about when it was supposed to be sealed information. MDLR wouldn't be an officer of the court. I just wonder how it was found out what the officer said.

 

[ICit]

I think we'd all like to know what's changed so drastically from the first trial to justify the closed proceedings.

Remember when JSS said that there would be no court on two days due to jury? IIRC Dec 1st and 4th. Could one of those days have been because this juror had a court appearance and then that appearance did not go well? A court appearance for this juror would be an appointment that she could not get changed!

 

[Steve44]

So it appears JSS is allowing Nurmi to stall until the COA issues their written ruling or worse after Nurmi appeals it the ASC. I think AZL said there's no deadline for the written ruling, so does that mean she's ok with waiting indefinitely?

 

[grammieto5]

Just trying to sort things out in my head.

Has it been established as fact that these files actually existed on Travis's hard drive, seeing as they weren't seen in the first trial phase? If they do exist, has it been proven that Travis downloaded them, and they weren't there because of a virus or someone planting them?

YES! And if they do exist are they kiddie ? Nothing else matters.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

Does anyone really believe Juan Martinez would allow a juror, who wrote a bad check in 2006, and has potential charges/arrest pending, on this jury? There is no way.

Absolutely NOT !

I have no doubt that Juan ran a criminal background check on each juror chosen -- probably before they were empaneled -- just in case ... remember what happened in the trial with the juror with the DUI.

Juan is brilliant and does not miss a beat !

JMO but I think there is "more to the story" about this juror #3 ... but we shall see !


Oh, and Good Morning, Y'all !

:seeya:

 

[MeeBee]

Absolutely NOT !

I have no doubt that Juan ran a criminal background check on each juror chosen -- probably before they were empaneled -- just in case ... remember what happened in the trial with the juror with the DUI.

Juan is brilliant and does not miss a beat !

JMO but I think there is "more to the story" about this juror #3 ... but we shall see !


Oh, and Good Morning, Y'all !

:seeya:

That juror got a DUI during the trial.

 

[bsk]

So it appears JSS is allowing Nurmi to stall until the COA issues their written ruling or worse after Nurmi appeals it the ASC. I think AZL said there's no deadline for the written ruling, so does that mean she's ok with waiting indefinitely?

After he loses at every level in AZ surely she'll do the only fair thing and wait until he has a chance to get the US Supreme Court to review it.

 

[bsk]

Jeff Gold says we started with 19 jurors, not 18, so there are still 4 alternates left. Is that correct?