Depends on whom you're asking.
Some people use the terms sociopath and psychopath interchangeably. Some people prefer one to another. Some others believe psychopathy is genetic whereas a sociopath is born from environmental factors. There's a lot of kerfuffle within the psych community over these terms and their use - as much as antisocial v. psychopathy.
There is absolutely no diagnosis for sociopathy - even forensically, nor a test for it, but there are definitely esteemed psychologists who feel not only is there a distinct difference between the terms, but sociopathy is deserving of its own label.
I tend to stick to using just psychopathy as a label but for me there's varying levels of it - you've got 'good' psychopaths - one who literally can have you believing their reality, who get away with multiple crimes or scams, who are extremely adept at mimicking emotions and fitting in. And then you have the 'bad' ones like Jodi - chaotic, sloppy, insincere, transparent, who don't really ever fit in, can't lie her way out of a paper bag and sets our nerves on edge just to look at her. I like to keep it simple.
Here's a psychology today article describing one psych's view of psychopathy vs. sociopathy. Jodi wouldn't fit neatly into either category using his descriptions but you can find a ton more googling too if anyone's interested. It really is just a matter of opinion for a great many. HTH
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wicked-deeds/201401/how-tell-sociopath-psychopath