Never mind. Jen might be wrong here.
https://www.facebook.com/Justice4Travis/posts/711743835568428
"UPDATE RE VERNON PARKER -
It was confirmed to me that Parker was the bishop in Travis' ward from people who attended said ward. The fact that he's a State witness came from another page. That is now being disputed due to the latest minute entry. As it stands, I can't confirm if Parker is a State or Def. witness. I'm sorry for not checking that fact before posting - I trusted the source. It won't happen again. My apologies to you all.
Feel free to chime in with your thoughts/views.
Also, please let me know what you think of this page and if you'd like to see any changes, improvements etc. What can we do to make this a better experience for you, going forward?
EDITED TO ADD: Parker is a def. witness."
So confused. He's from Travis' old ward but the defense wants to call him?
Defense witnesses have not been publicly named.
In fact, Judge Sherry K. Stephens ordered the list sealed and ordered that fact published.
JSKS has also ordered Vernon Parker's name published as a witness.
Therefore, she is either in violation of her own order to keep the especially cruel lying torture murderess's witnesses' names sealed, or Vernon Parker is not a defense witness.
While such an obvious contradiction would not be beyond JSKS or Maricopa County Superior Court, as previously stated, I believe we can safely conclude that Vernon Parker is either not a defense witness or that he is, but that he prefers to have his name made public (unsealed) despite that fact.
MeeBee, do you know (or remember, I think I used to know lol) where Travis' Grandmother lived when he went to live with her?
ETA: I *thought* she was in Phoenix/Mesa and that's how he got there but my memory is cloudy on that.
Confused.....Vernon Porter? Vernon Davis? How did Vernon Davis morph into Vernon Porter? :waitasec:
How about this possibility? Maybe D. Vernon Parker was on the defense mitigation witness list, but refused to appear for his interview with Juan on the ground that he had already spoken to the defense and told them he had nothing to say in favor of Jodi and wanted off the list ASAP, and the defense agreed to take him off the list. Then Juan said, well hey, maybe I need to talk to you after all because it sounds like you might have something helpful to say on my side, and VP said, I would really prefer not to be involved. [Now somewhere in all this there must be a subpoena or threat of a subpoena, or I don't get where the judge gets the power to "order" him to participate.]
And then the defense said, but wait, your honor, remember when we had the sealed hearing about whether we could argue XYZ at the mitigation trial, and you called VP on the phone to preview what kind of testimony that would involve, and then you said no, we can't argue XYZ? That topic is off the table, right? And the judge said right.
Disclaimer: This is just a guess. I know nothing more than any of you.
Makes sense to me that he would be a defense witness since it was ordered he volunteer to be interviewed by State.Never mind. Jen might be wrong here.
https://www.facebook.com/Justice4Travis/posts/711743835568428
"UPDATE RE VERNON PARKER -
It was confirmed to me that Parker was the bishop in Travis' ward from people who attended said ward. The fact that he's a State witness came from another page. That is now being disputed due to the latest minute entry. As it stands, I can't confirm if Parker is a State or Def. witness. I'm sorry for not checking that fact before posting - I trusted the source. It won't happen again. My apologies to you all.
Feel free to chime in with your thoughts/views.
Also, please let me know what you think of this page and if you'd like to see any changes, improvements etc. What can we do to make this a better experience for you, going forward?
EDITED TO ADD: Parker is a def. witness."
So confused. He's from Travis' old ward but the defense wants to call him?
Makes sense to me that he would be a defense witness since it was ordered he volunteer to be interviewed by State.
Wow, so I've been talking about Vernon Parker on The State vs JA page on fb. I wasn't rude or anything, just kindly letting them know they shouldn't confirm anything that isn't 100%. And they removed all my comments and blocked me from posting and removed my 'likCe.' What. The. Hell?
How about this possibility? Maybe D. Vernon Parker was on the defense mitigation witness list, but refused to appear for his interview with Juan on the ground that he had already spoken to the defense and told them he had nothing to say in favor of Jodi and wanted off the list ASAP, and the defense agreed to take him off the list. Then Juan said, well hey, maybe I need to talk to you after all because it sounds like you might have something helpful to say on my side, and VP said, I would really prefer not to be involved. [Now somewhere in all this there must be a subpoena or threat of a subpoena, or I don't get where the judge gets the power to "order" him to participate.]
And then the defense said, but wait, your honor, remember when we had the sealed hearing about whether we could argue XYZ at the mitigation trial, and you called VP on the phone to preview what kind of testimony that would involve, and then you said no, we can't argue XYZ? That topic is off the table, right? And the judge said right.
Disclaimer: This is just a guess. I know nothing more than any of you.
Aw I am so sorry MeeBee. Wonder if the mod just misunderstood? Your comment was correct. None of us know for sure.