So how would JM address the testimony of this witness in his closing arguments?
I wonder if this was a brilliant strategy to hamstring JM's closing argument? If it is, I give CMJA no credit for it...
So how would JM address the testimony of this witness in his closing arguments?
Did Matt live in Costa Rica or something. Did someone mention that? I dunno. I give. I am exhausted with guessing. I am gonna go binge on The Office reruns for a while...
View attachment 62458
Hope tweeters tell us if CMJA fakes tears again while listening.
I have no doubt you are right AZ...I was just thinking of a post I read that said Travis' family had the right to stay but JAs family didn't.Except that the media has the legal right to be there. And so does the public for that matter. It has to be something very serious IMO. I hope we eventually get to know, because so far this is not conducive to confidence in the justice system.
This might be different, though, because this part is not the trial; it's the penalty phase. I believe that in a trial, the defendant has the right to confront their accuser. In mob trials, the people testifying against mobsters are required to be known to them, because of the right to confront your accuser. This person we are speculating about isn't Jodi's accuser, but rather a mitigator, working on Jodi's behalf. Having said that, I'd still like to know who it is, and why they require such secrecy to be of assistance to a vicious murderer