uke::banghead:
^^^ HUH?
On both points.
(I must need a RAM upgrade, because I can't compute these statements, especially together.)
Also note the 'bolded by me' phrase. Subconscious slip, Wudge? I mean, all of us 'Frails' are likely multi-faceted, and fufill many roles, but not many of us could honestly boast that we are 'women' in a singular body. Casey might fit the bill, [not proven or diagnosed,] but, most of us sing, 'I am WoMAN, hear me roar,' versus 'I am WoMEN, hear me obfuscate, obstruct and bely the obvious.'
Mind you, you might have a point in stocking the jury with Men-Folk when we apply our game-face & studiously selective attire.
'splain points please, in detail, lest this be misinterpreted by prospective jurors of both genders, (and all persuasions,) out there all around the world.
I think it was just a typo.^^^ HUH?
On both points.
(I must need a RAM upgrade, because I can't compute these statements, especially together.)
Also note the 'bolded by me' phrase. Subconscious slip, Wudge? I mean, all of us 'Frails' are likely multi-faceted, and fufill many roles, but not many of us could honestly boast that we are 'women' in a singular body. Casey might fit the bill, [not proven or diagnosed,] but, most of us sing, 'I am WoMAN, hear me roar,' versus 'I am WoMEN, hear me obfuscate, obstruct and bely the obvious.'
Mind you, you might have a point in stocking the jury with Men-Folk when we apply our game-face & studiously selective attire.
'splain points please, in detail, lest this be misinterpreted by prospective jurors of both genders, (and all persuasions,) out there all around the world.
(Bolded by me) Personally, I'm thrilled to learn KC intends to tell what she knows at her trial. I just can't figure out how JB intends KC to do that, since he can't possibly let her testify and be subject to cross-examination. (Although, God, how I would love it if he did.)
So, what sort of judicial judo does JB have in mind that would enable KC to tell what she knows without actually testifying to it in open court? Lemmee think. How about if he says,
"Your honor, my client can't possibly testify here to what she knows without endangering her child, but she has written it all down in invisible ink on these 12 identical post-it notes which her mother, Mrs. Cindy Complicit, has sworn under oath are true and complete. If your honor permits, I will pass them out to the jurors....?"
Pause for reply from judge...
"With all due respect, your honor, this is Florida and the sun shines all the time, everywhere. However, I'll be happy to tell our lawfirm's spokesperson, Mr. Todd Tedious, what to do with them when he gets back to his home state...
"Thank you, your honor. Now, since you won't allow my client, Miss Casey O'Cutie, to reveal everything she knows to the jury via her post-it notes, may I suggest we allow her to go over to the jurrors and whisper in each jurror's ear--after she whispers in yours and mine, of course?"
Apologies if this post isn't suitable for this thread or WS, but I'm quite new here and this case is making me crazy because nearly all the major participants are so impossibly IRRATIONAL.
(Bolded by me) Personally, I'm thrilled to learn KC intends to tell what she knows at her trial. I just can't figure out how JB intends KC to do that, since he can't possibly let her testify and be subject to cross-examination. (Although, God, how I would love it if he did.)
So, what sort of judicial judo does JB have in mind that would enable KC to tell what she knows without actually testifying to it in open court? Lemmee think. How about if he says,
"Your honor, my client can't possibly testify here to what she knows without endangering her child, but she has written it all down in invisible ink on these 12 identical post-it notes which her mother, Mrs. Cindy Complicit, has sworn under oath are true and complete. If your honor permits, I will pass them out to the jurors....?"
Pause for reply from judge...
"With all due respect, your honor, this is Florida and the sun shines all the time, everywhere. However, I'll be happy to tell our lawfirm's spokesperson, Mr. Todd Tedious, what to do with them when he gets back to his home state...
"Thank you, your honor. Now, since you won't allow my client, Miss Casey O'Cutie, to reveal everything she knows to the jury via her post-it notes, may I suggest we allow her to go over to the jurrors and whisper in each jurror's ear--after she whispers in yours and mine, of course?"
Apologies if this post isn't suitable for this thread or WS, but I'm quite new here and this case is making me crazy because nearly all the major participants are so impossibly IRRATIONAL.
Both the defence and the prosecution can use these tapes. This was very effectively done in the Scott Peterson case.
