- Joined
- Apr 29, 2017
- Messages
- 5,001
- Reaction score
- 70,771
I am no expert, but I'd say there is a threat as long as this man is on the loose. If they don't know a motive, then they don't even know if it was targeted or part of a bigger plot with other locations being at risk. If there was a specific target, then who's to say this person isn't going to come for that person again? I'd say people need to live, but to say there is no threat it ridiculous. There was no known specific threat before this tragedy either and look what occurred.Thank you for sharing that @Dotta …… and not at all directed at you……
But seems that admonition by the FBI is perhaps at odds with words from IIUC the town and mayor that there is no perceived threat (or words to that effect).
Seems IMO that all investigators and law enforcement officials and the FBI need to ‘get on the same page’. And rather quickly IMO. MOO
These people lifted a lock down order as soon as they took the wrong person in custody and then had to back track so I think it's safe to say to cover their rears they are saying this about no threat.
IMO
Last edited: