camcneishg
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,333
- Reaction score
- 20,960
I was thinking Angela Corey? I know she is for duval and clay....putnam is right next to us...
Your wrong cajun and before you shoot and kill someone you should familiarize yourself with the law completely. There are several considerations involved, such as "duty to retreat" being one of them . . .
Here is a simplistic overview of those considerations;
In general, one (sometimes more) of a variety of conditions must be met before a person can legally use the Castle Doctrine;
An intruder must be making (or have made) an attempt to unlawfully and/or forcibly enter an occupied home, business or car.
The intruder must be acting illegallye.g. the Castle Doctrine does not give the right to attack officers of the law acting in the course of their legal duties.
The occupant(s) of the home must reasonably believe that the intruder intends to inflict serious bodily harm or death upon an occupant of the home.
The occupant(s) of the home must reasonably believe that the intruder intends to commit some other felony, such as arson or burglary.
The occupant(s) of the home must not have provoked or instigated an intrusion, or provoked or instigated an intruder to threaten or use deadly force.
The occupant(s) of the home may be required to attempt to exit the house or otherwise retreat (this is called the "Duty to retreat" and most self-defense statutes referred to as examples of "Castle Doctrine" expressly state that the homeowner has no such duty).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Doctrine_in_the_United_States
JMO
People keep picking on RC and getting Misty all confused.
Granny said she was asleep at the beginning, but she said that the Croslins started it.
If I am right I believe it is Harry Shorstein.
When the LE stated that all would be looked into...digital images...my hinky meter went up. I wonder if the Croslin's videoed the visit? That would be awesome, because you can't change what is recorded. Well, you can but LE knows hows to make sure it's legit.
I googled SA for FL, and in the 7th Circuit it is saying R.J. Larizza......
This is not an upstanding family. They have extensive criminal backgrounds. They are also druggies from momma down the all the kids. They give false addresses. How do we know that they were not lying?? One more thing. Misty is extremely close to her brother Hank jr aka Tommy. :behindbar
Am I the only one who thinks that Misty will be persuaded to press charges on her brother and father for "supposedly" hitting her in the face? I'm betting that she will, just to support Ron's claims.
Middle of the night.....hahahaha....now we begin to see why there is such a misunderstanding over what time CS's arrival at "mid morning" means!
To me middle of the night is from about 2 am to 4 am......and 10:45 is more like late evening! All in one's interpretation!
Jr. wasn't there.I wonder if Jr. got to see another violent circus. This child is being influenced in a very negative way. If he slept through this one I would be worried about his health.
Yup, just another one of those "pesky" laws again.The dumbest thing i heard from that video..that reaching in a open car window u are charged burglary..WTH...boy they must be desperate to charge him,,assault & battery is one thing but BURGLARY...ridiculous....
LT...everyone should be concerned about Butterbean...few are. He has not had a good life, let's face it!
------
The statements made that Misty's brother had called her off and on all day makes one wonder if there was a fight going on between Misty and Ron all day and that Misty had communicated this to her family and her brother was calling multiple times to check on her welfare and to encourage her to get away from Ron. My thoughts only here. I can also see where Ron could threaten to beat up Misty's brother if he showed up to get her. I can understand why Misty would call for help and then tell them not to come.
Jr. wasn't there.