why not? if the next question was 'who" then he could have said "can't comment".
Perhaps they are hoping any person that saw Samantha in the forest comes forward to rule themselves out?
Keeping in mind they have a lot of cctv.
why not? if the next question was 'who" then he could have said "can't comment".
You'd think so, wouldn't you.At least this now might stop all the " did she ever really leave home" questions
As mentioned above, sometimes police release info to spook someone they are watching.The next word I'm hoping to see in this case is "arrest".
The next word I'm hoping to see in this case is "arrest".
…“deceased”. Unfortunately, I’m afraid.Right along with "Sam has been found".
Don't be too smug Toots!You'd think so, wouldn't you.
Depends on the intelligence given to the police, they might be able to search further away from where the police will beIs the Mt. Clear area part of where Jake and the other searchers are looking.
And what happens to their search now.
Like they used to find Erin Patterson’s electronics?I wonder if they might use the dogs that seek out mobile phones, sim cards etc?
Yes. I'm not sure how they go searching bush thou?Like they used to find Erin Patterson’s electronics?
WowYes. I'm not sure how they go searching bush thou?
I notice that at the beginning of the search, it was revealed her phone pinged at 7pm in a neigubouring town of Buninyong. So that would be evidence her phone was removed, along with her.I wonder if they might use the dogs that seek out mobile phones, sim cards etc?
I thought it was 5 p.m.I notice that at the beginning of the search, it was revealed her phone pinged at 7pm in a neigubouring town of Buninyong. So that would be evidence her phone was removed, along with her.
JMO
Yes, sure.I thought it was 5 p.m.