MsFacetious
What a Kerfuffle...
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 21,623
- Reaction score
- 33,073
1) The defense bringing in Jones’ religion during closing arguments was a big mistake for them I think. I’m pretty sure “Thou shalt not kill” takes precedent over some preacher’s call to beat your children till they love you.
2) I think the prosecution nailed it when they pointed out everything he did after Nahtahn died was about Tim Jones.
3) Tim Jones only wipes his eyes when defense Attys or defense witnesses are talking.
4) Unanswered question that the prosecution brought up briefly yesterday...Why did Elias say to his father “Daddy, take me with you” right before Jones killed him? I think Jones was already packing to get out of town.
I don't want a not guilty by reason of insanity. I don't want that risk of him being released in a few years. I've seen it happen and it's devastating. I want one of the guilty verdicts. Please. I'm confident that is what will happen. I think the jury simply needs to decide if he was mentally ill or not.
For most of the trial I kept wondering why the prosecution wasn’t calling any psychologists or psychiatrists. They were very effective in cross examination though.
Now I realize that with each expert the defense called, the prosecution was letting out a little more rope for the defense to hang itself, knowing that they, the prosecution, had the nuclear bomb in it’s arsenal...Dr Cruz’s testing.
The bomb was armed when Dr Cruz said Jones failed the “lie” test. That bomb was released from the plane when she said the testing indicated that Jones was not a reliable “historian” of events surrounding the crime. That bomb was successfully detonated when Dr Cruz interrupted the defense atty who was cross examining her by reading meaningless computer data summaries. Dr Cruz basically said......Yes all that is right...but I want to make sure the jury understands...that data and those summaries are based on Mr Jone’s answers and that the validity tests indicated those answers were exaggerated not to be relied on.
Boom.
I don't want a not guilty by reason of insanity. I don't want that risk of him being released in a few years. I've seen it happen and it's devastating. I want one of the guilty verdicts. Please. I'm confident that is what will happen. I think the jury simply needs to decide if he was mentally ill or not.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.