SC - Heather Elvis, 20, Myrtle Beach, 18 Dec 2013 - #11

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #701
More info about search warrants/cell phone data searches, etc.

Determining Probable Causes
A search is not reasonable unless there was probable cause to believe that the search would produce evidence of a crime or contraband. Probable cause is defined as a state of facts which would lead a man of ordinary care and prudence to believe that the object sought is presently located at the designated place. The standard is the same whether the search is with or without a warrant, but the constitutional provision and court decisions make it clear that a warrant is preferred, unless there is good reason for not taking the time to obtain the warrant.

Source: http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/summaryCourtBenchBook/HTML/CriminalC.htm

Obtaining CDR (Cell Data Records)
Social networking sites have created an environment that allows easy sharing of content across the Web. Each time content is shared or requests are sent, the receiving servers generate a specific log entry in different logs across numerous networks. These logs can tell us what was requested, from what resource or page the request was generated, details about the system requesting the resource, and the outcome of the request. Facebook is one of the more popular social networking sites with nearly 700 million active users. If requested and received, the Web access logs can essentially retrace a user’s activity on the site. The actual content of a posting may not be determined through the logs themselves but the action of posting, deleting, or logging in/out can be confirmed through analysis of the access logs.

The table below contains some of the fields that would be found in access logs related to Facebook activity. Note that other data would be mixed in with a large amount of noise. The order of log entries can be summarized as such:

• A user navigates to Facebook.com and logs into an account.

• The user hovers over a link for Facebook ID 123456 from their home page.

• The user navigates to the home page of Facebook ID 123456.

• The user posts comments to the home page of Facebook ID 123456.

• The user deletes comments from the home page of Facebook ID 123456.

• The user logs out of their Facebook account while on the home page of Facebook ID 123456.

Under the Electronic Communications and Privacy Act (ECPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2522, cell providers must be served with either a court order issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2703(d) or a § 2703(c) search warrant to compel production of CDRs containing cell site information. See 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(1)(A), (B) (2010). In the case of a cooperating witness or victim subscriber, CDRs may be obtained with the subscriber’s consent. See id. § 2703(c)(1). For on-going criminal investigations, a § 2703(c) search warrant or a combined § 2703(d) court order and pen register order, 18 U.S.C. § 3121–1327, known as a “hybrid” order, may be used to collect prospective CDRs containing cell site information. For more information on collecting CDRs with cell site information, see CCIPS Online, available to federal prosecutors on the Department of Justice, Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) Intranet Web site.

Cell tower data and maps: Cell tower data/map records contain the geographical locations of the cell towers in the cell provider’s cellular network, recorded by longitude and latitude, and cell tower/sector information, including the number of cell sectors for each cell tower and the directional orientation of cell tower sectors for all cell towers in the cell provider’s cellular network. No ECPA-required process is available for acquiring these records because these records relate to the cellular network and not to individual subscribers. Depending on the cell provider, these records may be obtained through an informal request, administrative subpoena issued by an appropriate law enforcement agency, or trial subpoena. However, consideration should be given to acquiring such records so that they are admissible in evidence. See FED. R. EVID. 803(6) and 902(11).

CDRs contain accurate date, time, and location information for cell phones and, unlike a witness’ memory, are not prone to impeachment based on their accuracy, reliability, or bias. Additional information available in CDRs includes the telephone number of the wireless or wire-based phone connecting with the relevant cell phone, whether the voice calls or text messages were incoming or outgoing, the duration of voice calls, and the cell tower and cell tower sectors at the beginning and end of voice calls or when text messages are sent or received.

Cell tower and cell sector information for a particular cell phone is recorded in CDRs at the time

(1) a voice call is initially connected, (2) a voice call is terminated, (3) a connection is made with the voicemail message service to leave or retrieve a voice message, (4) a text message is sent, and (5) a text message is delivered, which may be different than the time that the cell phone user reads the text message. CDRs do not record “handover” cell towers/cell sectors through which a cell phone travels during a voice call unless a particular cell tower/sector is the originating or terminating point of a voice call.

A cell phone that is switched on and operational will register with a nearby cell tower so that the cellular network knows its location to enable immediate access to the cellular network to send or receive voice calls or text messages. Typically, the strongest signal received by a cell phone is the closest tower or one that is in direct line of sight of a cell phone. The cell tower with the strongest signal to a cell phone is known as the “servicing” tower that sends and receives voice calls and text messages to the cell phone. A cell phone also monitors and measures signals from nearby cell towers. As a cell phone moves through the cellular network, the cell provider’s Base Station Controllers and MSC monitor, control, and manage “handover” of the cell phone to other servicing cell towers/sectors to enable uninterrupted voice calls on the cell phone. Cell tower/sector information for the constantly-monitored location of a cell phone during “handover” activity is not recorded in CDRs. Only the cell tower/sector information for the call or message activity listed above is recorded in CDRs.

Source: http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/u

Thank you for posting this information.

Slightly o/t, I'm reminded of a case where 2 best friends, women, were accused of conspiring together & covering up the murder of one of their romantic mates. The evidence against them was based on one of their cellphones pinging in the area near where the body was found. However, it was later brought into question, the validity of a ping being a concrete locational identifier, due to the fact that when one cell tower becomes overloaded, the call goes to another tower. Therefore, just because their phone pinged in that area, it didn't mean they were actually in that area.

*not that any of this is necessarily applicable in this case, just mentioning it.
 
  • #702
Purchased a GM SUV equipped with On Star a few years ago. Next day, my wife was driving down the expressway at 70 mph admiring all the buttons on the dash. She pushed one & a lady's voice said, "Yes Mrs Ada***, how can I help you"..
My wife almost evacuated the car at 70 mph:floorlaugh:..

Giggles, but poor gal!
 
  • #703
Thank you for posting this information.

Slightly o/t, I'm reminded of a case where 2 best friends, women, were accused of conspiring together & covering up the murder of one of their romantic mates. The evidence against them was based on one of their cellphones pinging in the area near where the body was found. However, it was later brought into question, the validity of a ping being a concrete locational identifier, due to the fact that when one cell tower becomes overloaded, the call goes to another tower. Therefore, just because their phone pinged in that area, it didn't mean they were actually in that area.

*not that any of this is necessarily applicable in this case, just mentioning it.

I'm no expert but it seems like using a tower and pinging a tower are two different things. Your phone pings every tower it's within range of and the time for each ping is used to triangulate the phone's location. That's assuming you're within range of 3 towers though. To me it seems like if a phone call gets bumped to a further away tower, that would have no effect on how your phone pings. JMO, could be wrong.
 
  • #704
Closing for review...
 
  • #705
I've went thru and removed several posts discussing people in a suspect way. This is not allowed.

Rumor is not allowed and please don't post that that you heard something but can't post it because its rumor.

Thank you.

Discussing Heather's social media sites must have a link when dicussing or it will be removed.

Please continue...
 
  • #706
I really think her car was dumped. I don't have hard evidence and I know that isn't the popular POV, but I think she met someone somewhere else and then that person had to put her car elsewhere because its location would place the suspicion on him. So he or she drives Heather's car and maybe panics a bit and just dumps it in a somewhat familiar, but not unique location (like, know of it, but it isn't tied to you directly so it won't point fingers your way). I know it was locked, but I am so ingrained to lock cars now that sometimes I do it when exiting a friend's car even though my key fob doesn't work lol. It wouldn't seem that bizarre to me that it would be done out of habit.

This case is weighing on me. The picture of her learning how to drive the stick is exactly like something I would send my dad :(
 
  • #707
  • #708
Hi guys. Is there a searchable link for HCPD police logs? If so, can someone please post a link?
 
  • #709
  • #710
I really think her car was dumped. I don't have hard evidence and I know that isn't the popular POV, but I think she met someone somewhere else and then that person had to put her car elsewhere because its location would place the suspicion on him. So he or she drives Heather's car and maybe panics a bit and just dumps it in a somewhat familiar, but not unique location (like, know of it, but it isn't tied to you directly so it won't point fingers your way). I know it was locked, but I am so ingrained to lock cars now that sometimes I do it when exiting a friend's car even though my key fob doesn't work lol. It wouldn't seem that bizarre to me that it would be done out of habit.

This case is weighing on me. The picture of her learning how to drive the stick is exactly like something I would send my dad :(


Many have speculated on the car being planted.

The one objection I have to that is it actually could potentially leave even more evidence from the perp inside the car.

Still a possibilty though.
 
  • #711
  • #712
I really think her car was dumped. I don't have hard evidence and I know that isn't the popular POV, but I think she met someone somewhere else and then that person had to put her car elsewhere because its location would place the suspicion on him. So he or she drives Heather's car and maybe panics a bit and just dumps it in a somewhat familiar, but not unique location (like, know of it, but it isn't tied to you directly so it won't point fingers your way). I know it was locked, but I am so ingrained to lock cars now that sometimes I do it when exiting a friend's car even though my key fob doesn't work lol. It wouldn't seem that bizarre to me that it would be done out of habit.

This case is weighing on me. The picture of her learning how to drive the stick is exactly like something I would send my dad :(

I have always had a strong opinion the car wasn't put there by her either. I know they say the initial searched included the water, but I'm hoping they extensively searched in the water around the place her car was found, IF the car was planted there, I could see whoever putting it there wanting to dispose of the keys quickly, and perhaps throwing them as far as they could in the water. JMO
 
  • #713
There are some unsolved cases out of Wilmington, NC---only an hour and a half a way (Allison Foy, etc)

What's Ionnone (suspect) up to these days?

Mark Benson out of NC is a PI who investigated Allison's case (referred by CUE according to ID)--he could maybe be a valuable asset to Heather's case...I wonder if he's been contacted---he also has a radio show in NC...
 
  • #714
There is a winter storm warning for SC & NC coastal and inland counties Tues & Wed. Possible 3 + inches. It will be a pain in the rear since we are not equipped to handle such rare storms in this area. However it could be a blessing in disguise because there will be alot of lineman, repair crews and road crews out and about during and after the storm who might spot something of interest (re: Heather or other missing persons) while going about their work. We've had lots of busted pipes in our area, most recently underneath our next door neighbors house this morning. Crawling underneath a house gives me the creeps.

http://www.weather.com/weather/aler...ificance=A&areaid=NCZ108&office=KILM&etn=0001

* IMPACTS... VERY DANGEROUS TRAVEL IS EXPECTED TO DEVELOP AS ROADS BECOME SNOW COVERED. BRIDGES WILL BE ICY AND EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS. THERE MAY BE LENGTHY POWER INTERRUPTIONS AS WINDS GUST TO 20 TO 30 MPH DURING THE HEIGHT OF THE STORM.

Also, January 31 is a Super Moon and also a New Moon so it will be a dark night. BUT it will cause higher than normal tides. Maybe this will cause something to wash up into the brush around the banks of PTL if something belonging to Heather was disposed of there.

I am trying to remain hopeful but don't have a good feeling about Heather's disappearance having a happy ending. :(
 
  • #715
If there any indication that Heather did not drive the car to the dock, I can't understand why LE would not be asking people who had seen her car to come forward, showing it online or in the media, etc.

This makes me think they know she drove it there or know who did. And if they knew who did, that would seem to be arrest-worthy IMO.
 
  • #716
If there any indication that Heather did not drive the car to the dock, I can't understand why LE would not be asking people who had seen her car to come forward, showing it online or in the media, etc.

This makes me think they know she drove it there or know who did. And if they knew who did, that would seem to be arrest-worthy IMO.

My hunch is she did drive the car there. Her personal familiarity with the place would indicate that anyway. If a perp did it he would have to know her well enough to know this, and that to me seems like it would likely be uncovered eventually.
 
  • #717
  • #718
I did a street level view on google maps all the way through the route she would take from her apartment to get to PTL. Mostly residential, some businesses. This is assuming of course, she went straight from the apartment there.

There were a couple of gas stations, other than that not much that I could think of in the way of cameras.
 
  • #719
Many have speculated on the car being planted.

The one objection I have to that is it actually could potentially leave even more evidence from the perp inside the car.

Still a possibilty though.
Unless there is a public admission that certain DNA found in the car could be the result of previous outings in the car. Just a thought....Or DNA from anyone Heather might have taken someplace in her car.
 
  • #720
SBM

I, too, have often wondered why this guy has been pretty much ignored in the umpteen bazillion pages we have here... obviously, it's easy to jump on the obvious- she was (at one point) seeing a married man who did have (probably the last) contact with her prior to her going missing. So yes, legit to question that situation. BUT! I have SO many questions about this Other Guy: LE has not claimed to have cleared him. What was their relationship? When did Heather last see/speak/text this OG? Why would he feel the need to find her? Why would she feel the need to hide? I think we are on the right path as far as OMM/OMW, but obviously, all avenues need to be explored.

I posted previously it might seems a perfect opportunity for someone else (or ex) to be aware of Heathers relationship w/OM and take that as a perfect opportunity to get her out of the picture & have blame on OM. After doing the dirty deed you could then text OM from her phone (leading to OM saying don't call me anymore). Then all the heat/attention would be focused somewhere else & you could literally get away w/murder while everybody else is all riled up.......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
58
Guests online
2,548
Total visitors
2,606

Forum statistics

Threads
632,252
Messages
18,623,868
Members
243,066
Latest member
DANTHAMAN
Back
Top