3h ago
Why would he be smiling? What could possibly be amusing?
I love how CW keeps saying to MT to explain something “without getting into the weeds” … MT is a chatty guy who likes to describe everything in detail
3h ago
The question I was responding to was how the defense would account for Alex’s proximity to the kennels prior to the murders.There are two interviews with LE that were video. The investigators did not CLAIM he said he was not at the kennels. AM TOLD the investigators he was not at the kennels.
AM‘s friend and law partner testified under oath that AM told him he never went to the kennels that night.
The question I was responding to was how the defense would account for Alex’s proximity to the kennels prior to the murders.
Your second sentence here is exactly what I said in my second sentence. Which is the important distinction.
When you are tied to a story, you have to attack witness credibility to counter. Or you say that you recalled incorrectly due to stress or dismay from the trauma of the situation. Which is why I answered the way I did; that’s what I think the defense will attempt to show.
I’m not cheerleading for Murdaugh here. He is clearly a , fraud, thief, con man. But I’m not blind to the problems the prosecution needs to cover to secure a conviction.
or stand behind you IMOIt is painfully obvious that AM wasn’t the man they wanted to tick off.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.