Curious about thoughts on if the prosecution should have played these videos first and then tied in the witness testimony to refute his story? Maybe the testimony's would have been clearer to the Jury. What do you all think?
Oh yea they were shot with their own guns by strangers
Cory Fleming was shaking in his little boots! I don't think he expected the tables to be turning. I wonder why Danny H wasn't present for the interview (AM's personal lawyer)?
Can almost hear the gears turning in AM's head trying join his scattered thoughts to what he's being asked and confronted with.The timeline is tripping AM up ….
Ha ha, @Edvis, "sticking to his guns..."! (Actually, kinda "interesting" how the guns used in the crime happened to "disappear" themselves... Soooo maybe trying to NOT get "stuck" to his guns!)Sticking to his guns, wasn't there, wasn't me...was anywhere else but there, gonna ride that train.
Those of us who have been in abusive relationships (and mine was with a prominent man), know exactly how quickly they can go from lovey dovey (in public) to what they do in private. And there's tons of literature on this. There are all kinds of abusive relationships, the most common of which is probably the one where the abuser feels contritition and begs for forgiveness. But once you've been physically, verbally or otherwise assaulted by your spouse, I don't think things are ever the same.
When the kids are grown and the woman starts thinking about leaving (especially if she thinks the finances would support separation - but with a reduced lifestyle for everyone), that's the most dangerous time.
No, I don't think drug dealers kill people's families in order to make someone pay their drug bills. In fact, like private criminal defense lawyers, drug dealers typically demand payment up front.
Can you think of any cases where drug dealers killed the wife and son of a client because he didn't pay them?
IMO, these are nearly non-existent, few and far between, and they don't use the guns belonging to the family.
IMO.
I agree we have been all over the place here.Curious about thoughts on if the prosecution should have played these videos first and then tied in the witness testimony to refute his story? Maybe the testimony's would have been clearer to the Jury. What do you all think?