Pruddennce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,050
- Reaction score
- 10,749
yea, tall one and pocket size....dont these type of weapons have a hanging strap for the body? he didnt have to run anywhere to get a second weapon.
SC - Paul Murdaugh & mom Margaret Found Shot To Death - Alex Murdaugh Accused - Islandton #33
- Thread starter worm
- Start date
-
GA GA - Worth Co. BlkMale ~40 UP11098, dismembered torso in field Sep'88- Latest: The4TierBridge
- Status
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,757
- Reaction score
- 11,541
If I was AM AT THIS POINT, I would say STOP! I’m guilty! How can he listen yo this and his family ???
I think he did say he was here last week to testify but did not testify. So today after visiting Moselle he testifies accordingly. What would his testimony have been if he had not gone to Moselle???
To make it look like a cartel hit! He shot them with two guns because Alex thought that was what a cartel hit would look like. They were HIS guns for God's sake!!!
This is making me sick. I'm going on a booze run!!
This is making me sick. I'm going on a booze run!!
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 12,784
- Reaction score
- 144,832
Jerk!
Pruddennce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,050
- Reaction score
- 10,749
oh for goodness sake...they do not have the weapons....all the IF'S....ridiculous testimony.
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 10,868
- Reaction score
- 90,211
AM is starting to feel like this guy is his savior, listening intently, his face is just so easy to read
Loveallmyhorsesdogsandcats
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,668
- Reaction score
- 19,252
DBM
Last edited:
Good questions. JG probably took them out there and they met JMM who happens to be taking care of the place that I thought had been sold. I think JG is more familiar with Moselle than DH. JG seems more of a hunter. The way DH was handling that gun earlier in this trial leads me to believe he's not a hunter and would probably only manage to accidentally shoot down a Chinese balloon. moo
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 12,606
- Reaction score
- 165,684
Ha! And then he corrected it to “ the accused “
Loveallmyhorsesdogsandcats
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,668
- Reaction score
- 19,252
No more tears
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,757
- Reaction score
- 11,541
I understand why MM family can’t see or hear this in courtroom. If I saw photos I would have nightmares!
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 17,961
- Reaction score
- 298,327
Check Alec's behavior once LE arrived. He made as many fresh footprints in the general area as he could.
To obliterate his own footprints from earlier.
JMO
To obliterate his own footprints from earlier.
JMO
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
- Messages
- 232
- Reaction score
- 2,738
AM already absconded with the reward money - he knows who the killer is!
Edvis
Life, more to it then just living it!
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2023
- Messages
- 1,255
- Reaction score
- 13,077
For sure one can hang one over the shoulder while the other weapon is shouldered and fired, darn easy to drop one weapon and continue with the other.
Warning content is graphic:
That is all for Eisenstat. The defense's 13th witness is Tim Palmbach, a crime scene analyst from Connecticut.
Palmbach says he is an expert in blood spatter analysis. Oh boy.
Palmbach: The fatal shot to Paul was obviously consistent with a contact wound, but it was written up as an exit wound. So I told Murdaugh’s attorneys “this doesn’t look right.”
Griffin: How close would the shooter have been in relation to the shot on Paul’s head? Palmbach: This is a contact would. The shotgun barrel would have been in contact with Paul’s head.
Palmbach says the blast would have sprayed “a lot” of biological material onto the shooter at that close range. It would have covered their face/head/upper body and gotten into the shooter’s hair.
Palmbach: I don’t think it is at all possible that the second, fatal shotgun blast hit Paul from the angle Dr. Riemer and Kenneth Kinsey described in earlier testimony.
The jury is seeing a lot of graphic crime scene and autopsy images today.
Palmbach: There was blood spatter on the floor of the feed room, and that was from the exit wound under Paul’s chin/neck.
Both of the defense’s witnesses today believe Paul was shot directly in the back of the head during the second shotgun blast.
Palmbach says the shotgun blast that killed Paul had enough force to blast his blood, brains and bits of skull upward and toward the top of the feed room.
If I had to guess, I'd bet the defense is stressing this contact-wound theory because under that narrative, the shooter would have been covered in blood/brains, and AM was mostly clean when investigators arrived on scene that evening.
Palmbach on Maggie’s wounds: Maggie was facing the shooter during each of the shots. “She is moving, for sure. There is some degree of movement” from where the shooting most likely began. The shooter also moved toward Maggie, Palmbach testifies.
Griffin asks Palmbach if he thinks the carnage inflicted at Moselle was committed by one shooter or two. Palmbach: “My opinion is the totally of the evidence is more suggestive of a two-shooter scenario.”
Palmbach: “With Paul, I believe he was shot first. I believe he had no idea it was coming. He took the shot to the chest and very soon after, the one to the back of his head.”
Palmbach says one reason for the two-shooter theory is that the person who shot Paul would have been hit with a high-degree of force by pellet fragments, bone fragments and biological material. The shooter would have likely been stunned, “kind of out of it” for a short period.
Palmbach: They couldn’t have instantaneously suffered that, dropped the shotgun, picked up a rifle and “engaged in a meaningful assault.”
Palmbach also testifies it would have been impractical for the same shooter to carry two long guns. Palmbach testifies the person who shot Paul would have had at least one foot in the feed room. He testifies there was an opportunity for investigators to collect footprints.
Palmbach is helping the defense score points on their “investigators were inept” angle. He says investigators should have sprayed specific chemicals in the feed room to identify possible footsteps left behind by Paul’s killer. “Absolutely should have been done in this case.”
Prosecutor Savanna Goude starts her cross-examination with a sudden, playful dig. “Is it ‘doctor’ Palmbach?” “No.”
That is all for Eisenstat. The defense's 13th witness is Tim Palmbach, a crime scene analyst from Connecticut.
Palmbach says he is an expert in blood spatter analysis. Oh boy.
Palmbach: The fatal shot to Paul was obviously consistent with a contact wound, but it was written up as an exit wound. So I told Murdaugh’s attorneys “this doesn’t look right.”
Griffin: How close would the shooter have been in relation to the shot on Paul’s head? Palmbach: This is a contact would. The shotgun barrel would have been in contact with Paul’s head.
Palmbach says the blast would have sprayed “a lot” of biological material onto the shooter at that close range. It would have covered their face/head/upper body and gotten into the shooter’s hair.
Palmbach: I don’t think it is at all possible that the second, fatal shotgun blast hit Paul from the angle Dr. Riemer and Kenneth Kinsey described in earlier testimony.
The jury is seeing a lot of graphic crime scene and autopsy images today.
Palmbach: There was blood spatter on the floor of the feed room, and that was from the exit wound under Paul’s chin/neck.
Both of the defense’s witnesses today believe Paul was shot directly in the back of the head during the second shotgun blast.
Palmbach says the shotgun blast that killed Paul had enough force to blast his blood, brains and bits of skull upward and toward the top of the feed room.
If I had to guess, I'd bet the defense is stressing this contact-wound theory because under that narrative, the shooter would have been covered in blood/brains, and AM was mostly clean when investigators arrived on scene that evening.
Palmbach on Maggie’s wounds: Maggie was facing the shooter during each of the shots. “She is moving, for sure. There is some degree of movement” from where the shooting most likely began. The shooter also moved toward Maggie, Palmbach testifies.
Griffin asks Palmbach if he thinks the carnage inflicted at Moselle was committed by one shooter or two. Palmbach: “My opinion is the totally of the evidence is more suggestive of a two-shooter scenario.”
Palmbach: “With Paul, I believe he was shot first. I believe he had no idea it was coming. He took the shot to the chest and very soon after, the one to the back of his head.”
Palmbach says one reason for the two-shooter theory is that the person who shot Paul would have been hit with a high-degree of force by pellet fragments, bone fragments and biological material. The shooter would have likely been stunned, “kind of out of it” for a short period.
Palmbach: They couldn’t have instantaneously suffered that, dropped the shotgun, picked up a rifle and “engaged in a meaningful assault.”
Palmbach also testifies it would have been impractical for the same shooter to carry two long guns. Palmbach testifies the person who shot Paul would have had at least one foot in the feed room. He testifies there was an opportunity for investigators to collect footprints.
Palmbach is helping the defense score points on their “investigators were inept” angle. He says investigators should have sprayed specific chemicals in the feed room to identify possible footsteps left behind by Paul’s killer. “Absolutely should have been done in this case.”
Prosecutor Savanna Goude starts her cross-examination with a sudden, playful dig. “Is it ‘doctor’ Palmbach?” “No.”
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
