- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 17,963
- Reaction score
- 298,357
I wish that moment was filmed!When exactly did AM learn of the video?
Hey, Alec, the little detective wanted us to show you sumpin....
I wish that moment was filmed!When exactly did AM learn of the video?
Keep in mind, the remaining 2 (with one undecided) were not saying they thought he was *Innocent*..just that they had *reasonable doubt* going into deliberations. Given it didn't take long to *convince* them to switch a guilty verdict, it appears they simply wanted to be convinced. No doubt this was accomplished with the video PLACING AM AT THE SCENE of the crime within a very narrow time frame. HE WAS THERE. Juxtapose this with the ONLY defense offered>>>OTHERS WERE RESPONSIBLE?. This alternative is simply SCIENCE FICTION and requires incredible preposterous assumptions that simply defy any logic. I won't elaborate...the prosecution did this. Having said all this>>>AM THEN LIED ABOUT BEING PRESENT<<<. This is essentially the entire case in a nutshell.Will someone please explain how the 9 jurors were able to convince the 2 jurors that thought AM was not guilty to change their views?
Or really just in general?
When exactly did AM learn of the video?
The chicken ended up dying, too. (Alec testified to that.)I was thinking how odd that AM saves the life of a chicken from the dogs mouth, then moments later kills Maggie and Paul.
I wish BM & JMM would’ve been asked when AM told them that he was at the kennels. (Not sure if they would’ve told the truth or not though.) I wonder about that whole conversation between AM & all of the family members. The lawyers obviously knew right before trial but probably not much sooner than that.
I'm glad Blanca has Bubba <3They have dogs but didn't keep Bubba - wow. I would think they would have kept him because he was the one connection to the family.
I believe it was at that 3rd interview?When exactly did AM learn of the video?
3rd interview was Aug 2021 so that does not equate if the video was not extracted until April 2022. JMOI believe it was at that 3rd interview?
I'd say with the evidence.The juror who talked to GMA said they all talked for 45 minutes and figured it out.Will someone please explain how the 9 jurors were able to convince the 2 jurors that thought AM was not guilty to change their views?
Or really just in general?
Wow I didn’t hear that part, I’ll blame that on Alex too!The chicken ended up dying, too. (Alec testified to that.)
Wow I didn’t hear that part, I’ll blame that on Alex too!
Woody Harrelson would be more convincing than Alex ever was. LOLMurder - life sentence
Murder - life sentence
^^^^^finally! ^^^^^^
Woody Harrelson could play AM
MOO
I found it very fascinating that he went away or stayed with Maggies family after the murders…..like no shame in that man.It was very odd. He removed the chicken from Bubba's mouth and put it on top of the dog house -- told a story about how Bubba does not kill chickens and only wants to show the master he caught the chicken, and at some point, we learned the chicken was dead.![]()
Also …The one Male juror said in an interview that 2 jurors did not understand guns at all. They knew nothing about shell casings relating to the Murdaugh guns etc. so other jurors explained it to those jurors.Keep in mind, the remaining 2 (with one undecided) were not saying they thought he was *Innocent*..just that they had *reasonable doubt* going into deliberations. Given it didn't take long to *convince* them to switch a guilty verdict, it appears they simply wanted to be convinced. No doubt this was accomplished with the video PLACING AM AT THE SCENE of the crime within a very narrow time frame. HE WAS THERE. Juxtapose this with the ONLY defense offered>>>OTHERS WERE RESPONSIBLE?. This alternative is simply SCIENCE FICTION and requires incredible preposterous assumptions that simply defy any logic. I won't elaborate...the prosecution did this. Having said all this>>>AM THEN LIED ABOUT BEING PRESENT<<<. This is essentially the entire case in a nutshell.