"Science is just Science" CA quote

  • #41
I forget where I read/heard it, but Cindy said nobody knew that car as well as she did. She knew every crook and cranny and every stain in it. She said there were NO new stains.


"Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive!"

Poor George is under the bus again - he said he did see a stain.

Oh, and Cindy - it's "Nook and Cranny".
 
  • #42
I forget where I read/heard it, but Cindy said nobody knew that car as well as she did. She knew every crook and cranny and every stain in it. She said there were NO new stains.

Cindy said it in her (oh my heavens oh so long jeez could you get to the point already) FBI interview. She said that she'd driven it, Lee got it when he was able to drive, her husband had driven it, etc etc.
 
  • #43
Have you read the emails from Cindy's brother and Mother? She obviously either doesn't realize how stupid she looks or doesn't care.
I used to wonder why there was no one from her imediate family with them or supporting them but now after reading the emails that were exchanged, I know why they are not there. They have done thier best to get thru to her, to no avail. They are as much of a lost cause at this point as Casey is. No getting thru to any of them. Logic and reason is beyond thier comprehension. Fantasy and denial is how they deal with life.

It's worse than that, JJ....that's how they want US to deal with their life. They want everyone else to see it the way they tell it so it is only THEY who know the truth.
 
  • #44
It's worse than that, JJ....that's how they want US to deal with their life. They want everyone else to see it the way they tell it so it is only THEY who know the truth.

I completely agree with you! After observing thier public behavior, and getting some insight on thier private lives thru the exchages with her brother and Mother, I know am confident in my opinion that Casey is a product of her upbringing.
 
  • #45
Where have I heard that Cindy-ism before? Oh! I know! She was going to look in "every nook and cranny for her granddaughter."

Tick tock. We're still waiting.

I think CA got closer to what is left of Caylee than anyone else except perhaps GA....the stain in the trunk......so she has completed her search of the nooks and crannies.....and found her granddaughter......sorry mods if this sounds nasty.....these people bring out the nasty in me....
 
  • #46
  • #47
It's worse than that, JJ....that's how they want US to deal with their life. They want everyone else to see it the way they tell it so it is only THEY who know the truth.

Yup.....don't you just love how during the 911 calls CA seems very angry that LE isn't at her house YET!!!! By the 3rd call she's scolding the 911 operator (as if she's aware of the prior calls) because no one had shown up at the house yet....JUMP EVERYONE! MY GRANDDAUGHTER AND DAUGHTER HAVE BEEN MISSING, OH YEAH, ITS BEEN 31 DAYS, BUT YOU ALL BETTER JUMP!
 
  • #48
I forget where I read/heard it, but Cindy said nobody knew that car as well as she did. She knew every crook and cranny and every stain in it. She said there were NO new stains.
Well, if she and George had cleaned it as well as she thought maybe in her mind there was nothing "new".
 
  • #49
Do you think Cindy would be taking this position on scientific evidence if someone other than Casey had killed Caylee? Do you think if the police provided 99.9% proof that some other person killed Caylee, that she'd scoff at it and say that it means nothing? I don't. I think she'd be screaming from the rooftops for that person to get the death penalty, based on the scientific evidence presented to her. THEN it would be valid and believable to her.

And that's what makes her statement about scientific evidence totally NOT credible to me.

Good point. If LE told CA that they had found some evidence at JG's or RM's apartments but had written it off as inconclusive or of no import, CA would be talking out of both sides of her mouth about the validity of forensic science.
 
  • #50
Good point. If LE told CA that they had found some evidence at JG's or RM's apartments but had written it off as inconclusive or of no import, CA would be talking out of both sides of her mouth about the validity of forensic science.

ita,,,
 
  • #51
Good point. If LE told CA that they had found some evidence at JG's or RM's apartments but had written it off as inconclusive or of no import, CA would be talking out of both sides of her mouth about the validity of forensic science.

I wish a reporter would post the hypothetical question to her that if SCIENCE could prove either that Caylee was alive OR if deseased, proved someone other than Casey murdered her, would she trust and rely on that same science as credible evidence then??? I bet she would stake her life on it!
 
  • #52
I wish a reporter would post the hypothetical question to her that if SCIENCE could prove either that Caylee was alive OR if deseased, proved someone other than Casey murdered her, would she trust and rely on that same science as credible evidence then??? I bet she would stake her life on it!

Cindy has YET to be asked any hard-hitting questions, by ANYONE in the press!

But that day is coming. When she plants her rear in that witness seat at the trial, she is going to have to answer more hard hitting questions than she can even imagine. AND she's not going to get to babble incessantly in order to deflect and confuse.

I CANNOT WAIT!! :woohoo:
 
  • #53
Well, if she and George had cleaned it as well as she thought maybe in her mind there was nothing "new".
Remember at the bond hearing she clearly stated that there's "no evidence." I guess she thought they got it all.
 
  • #54
Cindy has YET to be asked any hard-hitting questions, by ANYONE in the press!

But that day is coming. When she plants her rear in that witness seat at the trial, she is NOT going to have to answer more hard hitting questions than she can even imagine. AND she's not going to get to babble incessantly in order to deflect and confuse.

I CANNOT WAIT!! :woohoo:
Neither can I. Neither the Prosecutor nor the Judge are going to allow any Cindy-speak or Cindy-isms. She will be pressed for the TRUTH and busted out for every lie she has told or is about to tell.
 
  • #55
Is anyone here have a degree in Forensic Psycholinguists that could help in diasecting the verbs & nouns in KC's sentences while giving staements to LE?
 
  • #56
How can a RN make such a hypocritical remark, when science is a system of aquired knowledge :waitasec:

Well, she doesn't want anything *factual* coming into play here. It's easier (for her) to go on fantasy, rather than science/fact. :woohoo:
 
  • #57
Is anyone here have a degree in Forensic Psycholinguists that could help in diasecting the verbs & nouns in KC's sentences while giving staements to LE?

Too late for me now, but that's something I would love to have done for a career.
 
  • #58
Months ago in an interview she also called it "HOCUS POCUS". *snort*

I seriously wouldn't want a nurse like her working on any of my family or friends.
 
  • #59
I wish a reporter would post the hypothetical question to her that if SCIENCE could prove either that Caylee was alive OR if deseased, proved someone other than Casey murdered her, would she trust and rely on that same science as credible evidence then??? I bet she would stake her life on it!

Great question, JustJax! One I'd like to see her answer: If "the nanny" killed Caylee would you have handed over the "wrong" hairbrush?
 
  • #60
IMHOO CA just gave a knee jerk response to questions about the hair and the smell in the car. She never stops to think or lets a question go unanswered. None of them know how to say the words "no comment".

Does she know she looks ridiculous? Maybe but she doesn't care, she is intent on defending KC no matter what the evidence may be.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
2,566
Total visitors
2,661

Forum statistics

Threads
632,760
Messages
18,631,395
Members
243,289
Latest member
Emcclaksey
Back
Top