At the very least, it's apparent that LE was investigating MS's accident as a possible child abuse case/homicide, based on the probable cause hearing of July 15, 2011 for search warrant (#41920).
Page 6, line 21, DDA Cano asked Det. Adkins:
Detective, what training and experience do you have regarding the investigation of child abuse?
Det. Adkins goes on to list his pertinent experience.
Reading down further, page 8 of the probable cause hearing, beginning @ line 19:
At approximately 648 in the morning, Coronado Police Department received a radio call of a female who had hung herself at the above listed address.
Based on Det. Adkins testimony in court, it does seem as if consensus had already been reached with regards to suicide (but I will add that Det. Adkins is with the Coronado PD & may have been out of the loop of RZ's death investigation).
Here's the part I find most interesting - on page 11, Det. Adkins conveys his reasons for wanting to seal the search warrant, one of the reasons being (lines 19-21):
We do not wish to divulge the information contained within these documents for fear that the perpetrators can destroy evidence.
This search warrant was applied for & granted on July 15, 2011. RZ died two days prior on July 13.
My question: Since Det. Adkins was clearly investigating MS's death as a possible child abuse/homicide case, and RZ had died 2 days prior, who is the possible perpetrator(s) that he feared might destroy evidence?
Certainly not RZ. She was deceased, so it was obviously impossible for her to destroy evidence if the search warrants were made public.
ETA: Gosh - after reading my post, I'm not sure if it even belongs in this thread. I apologize for the off-topic, but I was responding to an earlier post. Perhaps I should move it to another thread.
ETA II: If the medical personnel & LE had relayed their suspicions regarding possible child abuse/homicide to MS's parents, and these suspicions were relayed to other family members - in my mind, that may provide motive for RZ's death, if RZ was murdered. There - now I'm on topic.
But I would still like to know who Det. Adkins was referring to when he testified that he feared the perpetrators might destroy evidence.