Searches for Lisa Irwin/ merged thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #921
I dont remember about the helicopters. They stopped flying because they couldnt see anything. moo

THe link states that the FAA administered a NO fly zone 2 mile radius and 500 ft altitude. They could still fly BUT at 500 ft altitude you probably wont get anything. They did the same thing in Zahras case when they were getting close and pulling out evidcence. I dont remember anyone saying the FAA administered a no fly zone in this case before today? Does anyone else know?? TIA http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...ea-near-lisa-irwin's-home-again#ixzz1bAMQyQVV
 
  • #922
  • #923
THe link states that the FAA administered a NO fly zone 2 mile radius and 500 ft altitude. They could still fly BUT at 500 ft altitude you probably wont get anything. They did the same thing in Zahras case when they were getting close and pulling out evidcence. I dont remember anyone saying the FAA administered a no fly zone in this case before today? Does anyone else know?? TIA http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...ea-near-lisa-irwin's-home-again#ixzz1bAMQyQVV

Thats what im saying. it wasnt a no fly zone the other day. u r right.
 
  • #924
  • #925
  • #926
Thats what im saying. it wasnt a no fly zone the other day. u r right.

I am getting so tied of all of this. I am keeping my fingers crossed they find something soon.
 
  • #927
The no-fly zone is making me worry that what they have found, is not good. I hope Im wrong.
 
  • #928
They have N Brighton closed NE34th to NE36th. Helicopter in air can't tell which one.

I figure it will be the dad who breaks first and spills the beans.:twocents:
 
  • #929
The clown face in the blue box is just messing w/ my eyes.
 
  • #930
Anyone have any theories as to WHY they would enforce a "no fly zone?" I'm baffled unless LE has just grown weary of the media!! Which I can understand..
 
  • #931
  • #932
NOTAM Number : FDC 1/8252 Download shapefiles
Issue Date : October 18, 2011 at 1931 UTC
Location : KANSAS CITY, Missouri near KANSAS CITY VORTAC (MCI)
Beginning Date and Time : Effective Immediately
Ending Date and Time : October 19, 2011 at 0100 UTC
Reason for NOTAM : TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT FOR LAW ENFORCE
Type : Hazards
Replaced NOTAM(s) : N/A
Pilots May Contact : KANSAS (ZKC) Center, 913-254-8500
http://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_1_8252.html
 
  • #933
  • #934
Anyone have any theories as to WHY they would enforce a "no fly zone?" I'm baffled unless LE has just grown weary of the media!! Which I can understand..

JMO but I would think they would do that if they found something and don't want the public to see it... I hope I am wrong.
 
  • #935
  • #936
Anyone have any theories as to WHY they would enforce a "no fly zone?" I'm baffled unless LE has just grown weary of the media!! Which I can understand..

Yes. :(
 
  • #937
This is probably it. That poor, beautiful baby girl. Makes me so <snipping> mad.
 
  • #938
  • #939
Anyone notice that Ft Riley isn't far away from this search area?
 
  • #940
Anyone have any theories as to WHY they would enforce a "no fly zone?" I'm baffled unless LE has just grown weary of the media!! Which I can understand..

I would guess, wind dispersing evidence, privacy and not letting the perp know what they have. And pending notification stuff. lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
1,700
Total visitors
1,807

Forum statistics

Threads
632,373
Messages
18,625,415
Members
243,116
Latest member
jaysmith
Back
Top