Reader

New Member
21 Year
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
7,033
Reaction score
29,270
  • #1
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/t...l?partner=socialflow&smid=tw-nytnational&_r=0

SAN FRANCISCO — Kids. The reckless rants and pictures they post online can often get them in trouble, by compromising their chances of getting into a good college or even landing them in jail. What to do about such lapses vexes parents, school officials, the Internet companies that host their words and images — and the law.

Now California legislators are trying to solve the problem with the first measure in the country to give minors the legal right to scrub away their online indiscretions. The legislation puts the state in the middle of a turbulent debate over how best to protect children and their privacy on the Internet, and whether states should even be trying to tame the Web.

The governor, Jerry Brown, has taken no position on the bill. He has until mid-October to sign it, after which, without his signature, the legislation becomes law. ..........
 
  • #2
This is a ridiculous idea and IF it passed then websites will start forcing people that post to state they are 18 years of age or older in order to get around the idiocy of the CA law.

Plus Google and many other archiving sites will likely fight it in the courts as it would cause countless problems and require a tremendous amount of money to verify such claims and try to remove the data years later. If some dumb kid posts a bunch of junk and then decides 4 years later he wants it all "erased" from the web it is utterly ridiculous to expect website owners, archive sites, etc.....to go back and scour their data and try to remove it. Ridiculous and impractical.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
3,528
Total visitors
3,609

Forum statistics

Threads
645,137
Messages
18,834,773
Members
245,567
Latest member
fishbord
Top