There is a lot we do know:
1. 3 people are dead by homicide.
2. Husband has a shaky alibi.
3. Husband was cheating.
4. House was put into his name only months before.
5. Threats were made, but LE could not determine there was any criminal activity involved.
6. Husband was negligent on security issues at home when it was his profession.
7. Threat or Threats were left on the inside wall or walls of the home.
8. Calls were made to home and to LE before finding the bodies which was suspicious.
9. LE has determined it was not random, but isolated.
10. LE tailed husband openly.
11. LE asked specifically for people who knew the family to come forward with information. (Was not a general plea for information.)
12. No forced entry into the home.
13. Victims found in bedrooms.
14. Husband hired an attorney hours after the murders.
15. A court order had to be issued to obtain fingerprints from husband.
16. Husband did not notify her family of the deaths and did not speak to them for 2 days.
17. Husband did not allow time for her family to attend the funeral and held up their request for a separate one to be held in Chicago.
18. Husband was not included in being a target, but threats were supposedly against his affiliation to JMM.
I am sure there are more things, but these are what I can toss out off the top of my head. Feel free to add more!
1. You have suspects in any homicide. It is natural, and many times, the police are wrong.
2. We don't know if his alibi is shaky. Without knowing TOD, right now all we know is when he left, where he went, and when he arrived home.
3. This has been
alleged. I don't believe the woman has made a supporting statement in this regard.
4. So what? If he was planning to kill them, what would it matter? If anything, that would serve to make him look more guilty in the eyes of those so willing to convict the minute the first news flash came out!
5. You said it, not me, but I think we can all agree: Threats were made. So far, we know little about this. While I will admit this is suspicious, given his employment at JMM and the number of nut jobs out there who are radically anti-religious, it is just as believeable as a man killing his entire family via strangulation.
6. Negligent how? When I claimed someone may have left the window open everyone cried out, "No one would if they were receiving threats!" So, maybe it wasn't unlocked. We don't know if they had a security system, but we do know they had cameras. How is that negligent?
7. People were killed in the home too. Allegedly by the same person who had been leaving threats for months. Why does this point to CC?
8. We've been over this. If he was 15 minutes from home, an no one answered, I'd do the same given the history of threats.
9. Isolated = "the guy who had been threatening the family", not some drooling, maniac killer roaming the countryside.
10. Of course they did, he is the
prime suspect right now. I don't disagree with that, I just think the possibility that it was someone else could be real.
11. They did this because 3 out of 4 family members are dead. I would call it bad investigating if they did not do that. And again, see #10.
12. Damaged screen could be considered a degree of force. And if the killer found an unlocked window, there was no need for force.
13. So? They were not awake yet. It was early in the morning.
14. There are many innocent people who would do this. I would if I found myself to be in a similar situation.
15. I believe obtaining the Court order is pretty standard procedure-wise.
16. Yes, this is lowdown. But it does not = killer.
17. This makes him a
, but a grieving and shocked
too. Could it be that he is not thinking clearly after his wife and two kids were murdered? I'd say that, if innocent, that isn't too much of a stretch!
18. OK? I don't see a problem with this.
Does he outwardly seem guilty to me? Yes. Could he be innocent? Yes. There is still so much we don't know.
PS, I don't look down at house cleaning as employment, I've done it myself.
