This thing with the throwing out of the DVR or CD or whatever it was has been bugging me. Speaking from experience, a lot of men that cheat, especially abusive controling men, seem to get it in their heads that if they are cheating then their mate must be cheating too. Given that he was in the security business and obviously had access to equipment, it makes me think that perhaps the camera trained on the mailbox and the one aimed at the lake may not have been the only cameras in or around the house. Just those two don't seem to be much in the way of security IMO. Perhaps he had one or more cameras hidden in the house that SC did not know anything about. If that was the case then destroying anything that was recorded in the house on one of those camera would certainly be important especially if it showed anything incriminating on his part. Sure would be interesting to know what was on the DVR or disc that they recovered.