Sheri Coleman, sons Garett and Gavin murdered 5-5-09, Columbia, IL. Pt3

[mikeysmommom]

And who would he be blackmailing? JM?

Or maybe he was doing it for JMPoliticians,Big Donors, maybe even other Preachers.

 

[Texas Mist]

I don't know but I'll bet you Miss Motive knows! That might be what she'll be testifying about for the Grand Jury!

How would it be against JM though? When she first heard about the murders, she ran over and gave him support. I don't think she would have done that if she was being blackmailed?

:waitasec:

maybe her husband or someone else @ JMM?

still don't get how the 'threats' fit into all this (if indeed "real")

 

[Kimster]

:bedtime: My peeps are burning! I'll see y'all tomorrow!

{{{HUGS}}}

 

[analytical]

I wouldn't be surprised if we don't hear anything else.

RR ... IdleSleuth gave the clue .. I gave the answer. See a few posts below .. where it's included in a quote.

 

[pferrin]

What about the spying that idlesleuth mentioned...surveilance? I don't know about this one. James Bond story maybe?

 

[mikeysmommom]

maybe her husband or someone else @ JMM?

still don't get how the 'threats' fit into all this (if indeed "real")

I did read in a comment someone made who has been right before that JM is going to testify

 

[RR0004]

Don't know. I'd felt all along there was MUCH more to this case than meets the eye.

He did own or operate a "video surveillance company" .. it's in the posts somewhere but at this hour I'm not too "swift" to find that post.

Could his actions have resuilted in the deaths of his wife and children? He was blackmailing someone ... he got warned to "stop" ... he didn't so he got "payback.."
----------------
Obviously this came out during questioning the day of the murders .. the standard question .. "do you have any enemies ... is there anyone you know that might have a reason to want to harm your family"?

That would take one really sick individual. What could he possibly have on someone to warrant such a brutal act? Why would he/she risk that? They had to know LE would then be all over it. I would think if that were the case CC would have nothing else to lose and would divulge what he "knows" pronto.

 

[mikeysmommom]

That would take one really sick individual. What could he possibly have on someone to warrant such a brutal act? Why would he/she risk that? They had to know LE would then be all over it. I would think if that were the case CC would have nothing else to lose and would divulge what he "knows" pronto.

Maybe CC still was the killer,just used the threats for his own purpose .

 

[mikeysmommom]

RR ... IdleSleuth gave the clue .. I gave the answer. See a few posts below .. where it's included in a quote.

If you know more spill it LOL I wanna go to sleep:crazy:

 

[RR0004]

RR ... IdleSleuth gave the clue .. I gave the answer. See a few posts below .. where it's included in a quote.

Thanks...I failed to read further down. But, my gut still tells me it's a stretch. I've seen too much late night t$$lling. Can he be involved in something else...absolutely. Did someone do this as retribution? IMO it would have to be someone very emotionally involved in all this.

 

[RR0004]

Maybe CC still was the killer,just used the threats for his own purpose .

Yup...that fits better for me.

 

[analytical]

That would take one really sick individual. What could he possibly have on someone to warrant such a brutal act? Why would he/she risk that? They had to know LE would then be all over it. I would think if that were the case CC would have nothing else to lose and would divulge what he "knows" pronto.

Did you see the post a page or so back .. it explained the clue IdleSleuth gave ... he was hinting at BLACKMAIL. He gave the U.S.C. code for it.

 

[Texas Mist]

Don't know. I'd felt all along there was MUCH more to this case than meets the eye.

He did own or operate a "video surveillance company" .. it's in the posts somewhere but at this hour I'm not too "swift" to find that post.

Could his actions have resuilted in the deaths of his wife and children? He was blackmailing someone ... he got warned to "stop" ... he didn't so he got "payback.."
----------------
Obviously this came out during questioning the day of the murders .. the standard question .. "do you have any enemies ... is there anyone you know that might have a reason to want to harm your family"?

I'm still trying to figure out why he would draw attention to the 'threat' letters if he was the one doing the blackmail....if he was really doing this, and really afraid, why not protect his home & family?...and we've heard the 'threats' were related to his job - so he's bringing attention to the whole situation, right?

what's your thoughts?

 

[RR0004]

:bedtime: My peeps are burning! I'll see y'all tomorrow!

{{{HUGS}}}

Night-night...glad to see ya!!

 

[cleo612]

Black male=blackmail

 

[mikeysmommom]

I put in 1875 at that site and I found this

§ 1875. Appropriations

To enable the Foundation to carry out its powers and duties, only such sums may be appropriated as the Congress may authorize by law.

Maybe something to do with JMM

 

[analytical]

If you know more spill it LOL I wanna go to sleep:crazy:

This is why he needs a criminal defense attorney .... for the blackmail charges

Seems to be a tangled web.

I gotta go too ..

And this makes sense too as Margulis had said in the week since the murders that LE were not telling him if his client was a suspect nor really telling him (Margulis) anything.

Coleman hired Margulis because of the blackmail charges he seems likely to face.

IdleSleuth put up some other challenges to consider but I need some sleep to ponder on those but I got the USC Code right away.

Who was he blackmailing and why .. and over what?

 

[RR0004]

Did you see the post a page or so back .. it explained the clue IdleSleuth gave ... he was hinting at BLACKMAIL. He gave the U.S.C. code for it.

Duh...OK...going back now to read more closely. So this person is trying to say that it was this 18 year old male that was being blackmailed. He got so angry he decided to kill CC's family. This poster is willing to identify a suspect? I have to say, this does not sit right with me on many levels.

ETA: what on earth does 18 have to do with anything?

ETA: BTW...I get the blackmail part of it...but just think it's wrong to have it stated it as if it were the person responsible.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

I figured out the US Code part, but missed the Blackmail part. LOL

 

[pres101]

I hope you don't mean me because I get logged out often on WS or I lose my internet connection. Sometimes I forget to check the remember me icon at log in and once I close my browser window or if I lose my isp connection I have to log back in.

I am going to stay logged in and go do dishes. I'll see if I get logged out again before I get back to the board after doing dishes.

We will see if Idlesleuth makes another post while you are doing dishes. (joking of course)

I have read your posts and you give a very accurate description of Chester and Grace Church. I grew up in Chester and even went to Grace Bible Church as it was called back then. I can relate to all that you have said and don't miss any of it a bit.