Sheri Coleman, sons Garett and Gavin murdered 5-5-09, Columbia, IL. Pt3

[analytical]

I put in 1875 at that site and I found this

§ 1875. Appropriations

To enable the Foundation to carry out its powers and duties, only such sums may be appropriated as the Congress may authorize by law.

Maybe something to do with JMM

I think IdleSleuth made a typo .. his main clue was "black male"... should have been 1873 not 1875

 

[chestergal]

Doing dishes in the middle of the night? Now THAT's suspicious!

LOL... Not in this house and not when you have a hubby that works shift work most of the time. I wanted to get them done before he got off work this morning.

I am doing laundry also.

BRB... I gotta let my dogs out for a potty break.

 

[SuziQ]

Did you see the post a page or so back .. it explained the clue IdleSleuth gave ... he was hinting at BLACKMAIL. He gave the U.S.C. code for it.

And you just happened to know the answer to that supposed clue?

I'm thinking someone wants people to see something that's just not there.

Not biting...sorry.

 

[mikeysmommom]

This is why he needs a criminal defense attorney .... for the blackmail charges

Seems to be a tangled web.

I gotta go too ..

And this makes sense too as Margulis had said in the week since the murders that LE were not telling him if his client was a suspect nor really telling him (Margulis) anything.

Coleman hired Margulis because of the blackmail charges he seems likely to face.

IdleSleuth put up some other challenges to consider but I need some sleep to ponder on those but I got the USC Code right away.

Who was he blackmailing and why .. and over what?

Why Money-----What Sex---------------Maybe thats how Miss Motive comes in

 

[RR0004]

I figured out the US Code part, but missed the Blackmail part. LOL

Wow... this is getting more and more fascinating.

 

[mikeysmommom]

And you just happened to know the answer to that supposed clue?

I'm thinking someone wants people to see something that's just not there.

Not biting...sorry.

Could be possible CC was blackmailing some one but CC still the killer IMO

 

[SuziQ]

Could be possible CC was blackmailing some one but CC still the killer IMO

Too similar to the late night posts about the Grunds kidnapping Caylee, etc. There was an organized effort on the net to create reasonable doubt and point to another direction. And they always happened late at night.

 

[Texas Mist]

Could be possible CC was blackmailing some one but CC still the killer IMO

it's not exactly enhancing his image, is it?

 

[mikeysmommom]

Too similar to the late night posts about the Grunds kidnapping Caylee, etc. There was an organized effort on the net to create reasonable doubt and point to another direction. And they always happened late at night.

I missed those posts LOL.

 

[RR0004]

Too similar to the late night posts about the Grunds kidnapping Caylee, etc. There was an organized effort on the net to create reasonable doubt and point to another direction. And they always happened late at night.

Yes it does...and for some reason more often on weekends.

 

[cleo612]

Okay, so maybe Coleman was working as a private investigator and was "spying" on someone looking for incriminating actions or behavior.

So was he REALLY working for someone else, but was under the "employ" of JMM?

Secret Service?

CIA?

This is intriguing.

Where has he been traveling to lately? Florida we know, but where else?

If we can figure out where he was traveling to all the time, that would/could be another clue.

(Why do I feel like I am being led on a wild goose chase?)

 

[SeriouslySearching]

Knock...Knock...

 

[mikeysmommom]

it's not exactly enhancing his image, is it?

Not a bit, TO me he is the main suspect.The killings were too personal, even if CC was blackmailing or gathering video for his Boss Lady CC still the one IMO.

 

[analytical]

And you just happened to know the answer to that supposed clue?

I'm thinking someone wants people to see something that's just not there.

Not biting...sorry.

Yes .. black mail .. and the applicable USC code for same.

 

[cleo612]

And you just happened to know the answer to that supposed clue?

I'm thinking someone wants people to see something that's just not there.

Not biting...sorry.

LOL, thanks, SuziQ. I am going to follow your lead on this one and stop beating my head against the wall trying to figure it out.

I think someone is playing games and trying to make us "analyze" things that make no sense.

 

[chestergal]

And you just happened to know the answer to that supposed clue?

I'm thinking someone wants people to see something that's just not there.

Not biting...sorry.

Why do I feel Idlesleuth is sitting back in idle doing this at this message board?

 

[pres101]

I think IdleSleuth made a typo .. his main clue was "black male"... should have been 1873 not 1875

How did you figure out that Idlesleuth meant 1873 and not 1875? That seems a little suspicious.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

Gosh...no one said, "Who's there?" WTH?! LOL

My answer is....The Defense team trying out yet another strategy to see if it will fly.

No matter how they spin it...Chris Coleman is going to be charged and found guilty of those charges.

 

[yosande]

I think its really great that LE continues to observe CC. More than one poster here has mentioned that there is a strong possibility that CC could decide to "do himself in" and possibly take other innocent lives with him!

If this man is guilty of murdering his whole family, and he was going to commit suicide, imo, that would have been when he would have done it.
moo

Imo, if he is guilty, he will run, but he won't harm himself.
If he is not guilty, then he would feel guilty for being alive, and the guilt and suffering could cause a desire to end the pain, and be reunited with his family.
moo

I don't understand what is being implied about the video surveillance company, as it could easily be work related, after all he was in security, was he not?
I don't have enough info about the threats that are said to have occurred before the crime. Does anyone know more detail about that? If so, share please, tia.

Right now, the biggest thing I find suspect about him is that her family had to fight to have a service for them with them there. Not good. Sounds controlling, and cruel. A kind hearted person would not have done that imo. A control freak would though, which gives more weight to her name being taken off all possesions as a premeditated measure to reduce legal problems postmordem, rather than a financial debt overload, and using her name to get them up and running again after a foreclosure or bankruptcy status.

moo

 

[chestergal]

Knock...Knock...

Who's there?