Should Cindy and George be charged? Do They Need An Attorney?

Should Cindy, and/or George be charged??

  • Yes they should be

    Votes: 774 62.4%
  • No They shouldn't be

    Votes: 150 12.1%
  • I dunno yet

    Votes: 317 25.5%

  • Total voters
    1,241
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you do, I'd call in and ask you a question that would make you look super, super smart. Well, that's after I tell Nancy how darling her twins are. . . :blushing:

Send them a present and she'll mention you on air AND answer your question :dance:
 
Washing the clothes that were in the car and cleaning the car and possibly the car seat are punishable crimes based on George's interview stating that he knew that smell was the smell of a dead body, and Cindy's 911 call stating "it smells like a dead body was in the damn car". They both knew there was at some point a dead body in the car yet the washed the clothes and cleaned the car, possibly destroying evidence.
 
Washing the clothes that were in the car and cleaning the car and possibly the car seat are punishable crimes based on George's interview stating that he knew that smell was the smell of a dead body, and Cindy's 911 call stating "it smells like a dead body was in the damn car". They both knew there was at some point a dead body in the car yet the washed the clothes and cleaned the car, possibly destroying evidence.

respectfully BBM

Has this been confirmed? I know that CA admitted to washing the pants, but did either of them admit to cleaning out the car? I have always strongly suspected that they DID; I suspect this is why LE took the vacuum cleaners (were there ever any discovery docs on the contents?).

I could ALMOST overlook CA washing the pants. I can imagine a distraught woman trying to do mindless tasks to keep herself from breaking down. Then again, she had to go and GET them out of the car that smelled like a dead body (by her OWN WORDS!). Certainly, if they cleaned the car, then it's an absolute YES, they should be charged. If a jury finds them innocent, I will accept that.

Oh, and about OE on the sentinel site, sometimes I really do think it's CA. Sometimes I don't. There are plenty of KC sympathizers out there, even one or two here among WS. Everyone is entitled to their opinions . . . . and their sneezes. Amen.
 
I believe in one of the doc dumps there was mention of no examination of the vacs were needed. My guess is that there was nothing unusual in them. Mother and child lived within the household and you'd expect to find samples of their hair inside the vacs. If the trunk was vacuumed I would expect the contents of the vac would smell. Maybe KC took the car to the carwash before dropping it off at Amscot? JMO
 
Popping in..... Folks....please do not bring comments from other forums here. By doing so it invites discussion about someone else's opinion. Everyone here is welcome to share their own opinion, but we make it a practice not to comment on their opinions. If this is a post from another forum......then that person chose not to post it here. We have no business discussing it.
 
If CA and GA are not charged after the trial there will be huge outrage. The very thing that KC was first charged with (lying to authorities, hindering an investigation, etc) is exactly what the A's need to be charged with, if not more, after the trial.

Remember, they only have derivative-use immunity from anything incriminating said in their SA depositions. They do not have immunity from perjuring themselves (which they did) in the SA depos, or during the trial. They have lied under oath repeatedly and will do so again during the trial.

An example needs to be set to show that no one is above the law, and you can't just lie under oath, impede investigations, and tamper with evidence just because you "don't want to lose another".

And now you have the A's going out on that boat even after LE told them not to. Of course they're not going to listen. They've got away with everything else thus far.

I wish they'd take a hint. Not only are they NEVER invited to these things, they are always asked to go away in a not so friendly way. Nobody wants to be associated with them except nefarious individuals. How dare they insert themselves in other missing persons cases just because they can't keep their mugs off tv. You will never be real advocates for missing children while condoning the actions of a murderer at the same time.
Take care of your own very obvious problems before forcing your so-called help on other families who never asked for it and flat out refused it.
.Get.A.Clue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
158
Guests online
734
Total visitors
892

Forum statistics

Threads
626,006
Messages
18,518,563
Members
240,918
Latest member
brolucas
Back
Top