Death penalty is properly used for most heinous crimes
By Bill Montgomery
Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:41 AM
Regarding Arizona can be next state to reject the death penalty (Opinions, Feb.16):
As a county attorney with responsibility for deciding when to seek a death sentence, I believe it is necessary, once again, to set the record straight.
Bob Quick, a member of Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty, asks whether Arizonans feel better for having executed six murderers in 2012. That is a non sequitur.
Consider how these convicts earned their death sentences: Richard Stokely kidnapped, raped and murdered two 13-year-old girls; Daniel Cook kidnapped, tortured, sodomized and murdered two men; Samuel Lopez burglarized, raped, beat and stabbed a woman; Thomas Kemp, kidnapped, robbed and murdered his victim; Robert Towery robbed and injected his victim with battery acid, and then strangled him; Robert Moorman, while on furlough from prison, murdered his mother, chopped her body into pieces, and threw her remains in dumpsters.
BBM.....
I dunno, "Bob", do you live in Arizona? Do you pay taxes here? Have you had a family member or friend become a victim of a homicide?
To answer for myself, "Yes, yes, and yes". Does it make me "feel better"? Damn Skippy! These "monsters" won't ever have the opportunity to victimize anyone else or suck money from honest tax payers.
Just wish they'd shorten the appeal process, and if a convicted murderer WANTS to be executed ASAP,
BRING IT ON. And while they're on Death Row, cut out all the "perks". We spend enough through the whole justice system, we shouldn't have to pick up the tab for electricity for 2 electrical appliances, stamps, paper, and, seriously, WHY should they even have visitation AT ALL? Lock them down in a facility, bare bones, until the execution date. We don't need to pay wages for all the guards that have to move them from cell to visitation room and watch them. Phone calls? Pfftttt.
Get with the "Program", "Bob", what have YOU done lately to secure "victim's rights"? See, there's some things that we, as the victim's family, kinda pay .......like the casket, the funeral, the hearse, the mortician, the plot, having the victim's house cleaned, the cost of psychiatric help, estate taxes, loss of income going to trial, fuel costs back and forth to the prosecutor's and the court house, etc., etc., and we pay taxes on those, thus contributing to the "offender's" room and board while they await trial and later are incarcerated. Seems to me, that the "offender", with mostly free "Public Defenders" is NOT contributing their fair share. In fact, they're using MY oxygen.
Do I "feel better" when I have to go identify my loved ones body?
Seriously, "Bob", am I missing something? Where does one insert "feel better" in this entire process? Maybe you should use the term "suck less". Because, "Bob", the whole tragedy SUCKS BIG TIME.
So, REALLY, "Bob", execution still doesn't entirely make me "feel better". But it's a start, being that the only way I could truly "feel better" is if the "offender" could bring back my loved one, which can't happen. Knowing the "offender" is 6 feet under and can't victimize anyone else, helps me "feel better" to a degree.
Sorry, folks, got on and that post was the first thing I saw.........seems like "Bob" is one of those "Special Kind of Stupids". My Doc said I should try to ignore those people........just one of those days, so you'll have to forgive me!

lease: