- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 13,534
- Reaction score
- 89,072
When he says a rift between counsel, he is referring to Arias who is serving as her own counsel and himself. Nonetheless, he is not under Offices of Public Defense Services and other members of the team are, so as you say, there may indeed be dissension now between Nurmi and directives and permissions from those offices. But beside that, he is at odds with Arias herself and what she particularly wants to do.
Further, he is well aware that Arias wants to see the back of him and he makes clear that this is mutual antipathy. Nurmi's ideas of how to proceed conflict with the plans of Arias. He is a free agent with his own ideas.
Thanks Tuba,
l would like to know in what areas they disagree precisely, since during the first trial it appeared to me that he was in full control and planned her many days of drawn out testimony. I have read her reasons for wanting him off the case but her writing and thinking are so insane, all I could deduce fom her is that Nurmi was not drawn to her the way men previously were. I suppose because of lawyer/client confidentiality we will never know the whole story. When the trial is over and transcripts of the ex parte hearings are released, we will know more then. I do not care if he goes or not, and if so then good for him. I just don't want that to be a reason for another attorney to be appointed and the trial delayed.