SIDEBAR #38 - Arias/Alexander forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #321
  • #322
BBM: The surprise is where is it going? What is the jury going to find with all this testimony which effects their decision on Mitigating Factors? How is the defense going to "spin it"?


This is what I'm not understanding - why would the jury be hearing a continuation of the side trial Porngate/Misconduct.

I thought that was not to be in front of jury until the ruling - which is not going to be Weds. after this testimony.
That is now being heard in front of the jury that was not to hear anything about the subject until decision time.

Every day the trial is on I start out thinking I know what's going on, then by lunch I'm all :thinking::waitasec::crazy:
 
  • #323
You had nerve to even think of it :dramaqueen:

annoyed.png


"SW is a "stain" on Florida, NOT New York"...........1000 times?

:floorlaugh:
 
  • #324
This is what I'm not understanding - why would the jury be hearing a continuation of the side trial Porngate/Misconduct.

I thought that was not to be in front of jury until the ruling - which is not going to be Weds. after this testimony.
That is now being heard in front of the jury that was not to hear anything about the subject until decision time.

Every day the trial is on I start out thinking I know what's going on, then by lunch I'm all :thinking::waitasec::crazy:

Join the confusion club because I'm just as :waitasec:
 
  • #325
This is what I'm not understanding - why would the jury be hearing a continuation of the side trial Porngate/Misconduct.

I thought that was not to be in front of jury until the ruling - which is not going to be Weds. after this testimony.
That is now being heard in front of the jury that was not to hear anything about the subject until decision time.

Every day the trial is on I start out thinking I know what's going on, then by lunch I'm all :thinking::waitasec::crazy:

Today is the first day I am TRULY confused about what's going on......
 
  • #326
  • #327
"SW is a "stain" on Florida, NOT New York"...........1000 times?

:floorlaugh:

We :goldcrown: will not discuss this subject anymore. :dramaqueen:

carry-on-smiley.gif
 
  • #328
  • #329
  • #330
Omg! What does she mean dismiss the case? I'm sorry as I've been popping in and out.
 
  • #331
If JSS would allow the attorneys talk with out sidebars or silent the courtroom
I think we would have a better handle on what's going on.

In my opinion JSS is only allowing what is legal for the media/public to hear.
Testimony, if or if not the jury is present. Everything else is left to the judges' discretion.
She obviously does not want "everything" to be aired. I'm still unsure of the reason.
 
  • #332
  • #333
  • #334
I followed the Drew Peterson trial by tweets.
Not this bad.
 
  • #335
If the judge gets voted out by the citizens of AZ before this trial ends, would it be declared a mistrial, or would it just continue on with a new judge presiding?
 
  • #336
Cathy ‏@courtchatter 45s46 seconds ago
To my recollection, previous testimony by def witness was that Juan wanted to know if there were nude pics of #JodiArias on the computer.

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 26s27 seconds ago
The judge will not let the defense bring in this accusation that the prosecutor was looking for 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on these computers #jodiarias #3tvarias

Tammy Rose ‏@News20Chopper 44s44 seconds ago
It's go time. #JodiArias

MC Superior Court ‏@courtpio 53s53 seconds ago
State v #JodiArias Trial: the afternoon session is underway.

Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 59s60 seconds ago
Jury has been seated. Martinez continues cross examination with Flores back on stand. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 50s51 seconds ago
Please be seated, the record will state that the juror that brings the butt pillow is my forever favorite. - @kinseyschofield #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 1m1 minute ago
Juan and Flores back in action. #jodiarias


 
  • #337
BBM: The surprise is where is it going? What is the jury going to find with all this testimony which effects their decision on Mitigating Factors? How is the defense going to "spin it"?

That either Flores is Mark Furhman or Juan planted the 🤬🤬🤬🤬.
 
  • #338
  • #339
The accusations against Juan had to have been Jodi's idea. I refuse to believe that Nurmi & Wilmott are so low as to have originated them.
 
  • #340
Steve Krafft ‏@SKrafftFox10 44s45 seconds ago
#jodiarias Det. Flores says "there is no child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬" on Travis Alexander's computer.

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 55s56 seconds agoPhoenix, AZ
The objection was withdrawnFlores says correct. #jodiarias #3tvarias

Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 41s42 seconds ago
Martinez and Flores agree that there was only an indication of a single visit to a 🤬🤬🤬🤬 site but no 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on computer. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 1m1 minute agoPhoenix, AZ
Smith was talking about the registry but he said it only had terms on it no 🤬🤬🤬🤬 correct?Flores- Correct #jodiarias #3tvarias

Mike Watkiss ‏@mikewatkiss3tv 1m1 minute ago
Det Flores say there in no child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on TA's computer #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 47s48 seconds ago
Willmott back up with Flores. Willmott going to repeat nasty search terms. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 45s46 seconds ago
Willmott claims TA searched "Teen s3x" #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 42s42 seconds agoPhoenix, AZ
Juan- No child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 has been found on this computer correct?Flores- Correct #jodiarias #3tvarias
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
2,367
Total visitors
2,427

Forum statistics

Threads
633,057
Messages
18,635,695
Members
243,393
Latest member
lynaxnii
Back
Top