Sidebar for Caylee Anthony's forum #14

[Kimster]

It looks like only Hollywood gossip sites and local Florida media have picked it up. I searched Google News and I see nothing from the major networks...

I just posted that EXTRA has it up now. But I don't know how long it's been there.

 

[AZlawyer]

Makes one wish that Caylee's biological father could be found so that he could file a civil suit. Am I correct that he would be the only one who could do so?

Too late, if I'm not mistaken.

I think you're both right.

Pink, to answer your other post, "too late" means that the time limit for filing such a lawsuit has almost certainly expired.

 

[Hez]

Well, actually, in a roundabout way, they did discuss the book. Without Baez's book, we would not have been aware of this little ' fool-proof suffication' tidbit.

Casey has her lawyer to thank for this new evidence against her. LOL

RBM. :floorlaugh: Thanks just wasn't enough.

 

[AZlawyer]

Where is the anti-Casey website quote coming from?

Baez.

BBM
Yes.
And, iirc, early on in the case both sides signed an agreement to disclose evidence.
LDB is a straight forward, no nonsense, brilliant Prosecutor and she delivered all the discovery she had to Baez.
For Baez to think that LDB would pull a Trial by Ambush is, in his own words, ridiculous...the lawyer in that court room that would attempt that is Baez. And did he not try to do that with expert Jose Rodrigues? or was it Eikelbloom

Jose was still not required to disclose incriminating evidence to the prosecution, even after "opting in" to the disclosure rules. It just doesn't work that way for the defense.

I believe that if LDB had the computer search info on suffocation she would have used it in a Plea Bargain.
What are your thoughts on that AZ?

A plea bargain requires both sides to agree, so I have no idea if this evidence would have helped in that regard.

 

[Intermezzo]

Information is spreading. Extra has picked up the story! :great:

In the end, it was <modsnip> who brought the evidence to light after reading about it in Baez’s book. With the help of <modsnip>, a fellow member of an online Websleuth community, they requested the data and were able to extract the evidence. Once they found the searches, they turned their findings over to Local 6.

http://www.extratv.com/2012/11/21/c...ed-foolproof-suffocation-the-day-caylee-died/

Now I have their theme song dancing in my head

 

[Kimster]

Jeers to the Business Insider.

While the defense blames Anthony's father for the search, this timeline based on a WKMG investigation suggests it was actually Anthony. The news station does not indicate indicate how it obtained the information for the timeline:

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/casey-anthony-trial-mistakes-2012-11#ixzz2CtKj37ur

 

[Intermezzo]

Baez.



Jose was still not required to disclose incriminating evidence to the prosecution, even after "opting in" to the disclosure rules. It just doesn't work that way for the defense.



A plea bargain requires both sides to agree, so I have no idea if this evidence would have helped in that regard.

BBM
For discussion
Was it incriminating to Casey if it pointed to George if we go by Baez's (wrong) time of 1:50pm?

I believe Baez knew it was Casey, had to do damage control and had it fit into his George did it scenario.

O/T And just for the sake of point this out because Baez makes derogatory remarks that George can't spell, Maybe Casey can't TYPE properly.
I remember back in the day when we had to learn how to Type on manual or electric typewriters and the drills we had to do...and no looking down at the keys!!

 

[FootballMom]

I wonder if this new evidence will be used in the Lifetime movie ???

Meanwhile in Winnipeg, CA...

while filming is underway the screenwriters, producers and director are scrambling to include AZLawyer & JWG's most excellent findings into the script... (no actual verification of that, just thought it was funny to imagine they are.)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2216088/

 

[katydid23]

Jeers to the Business Insider.

While the defense blames Anthony's father for the search, this timeline based on a WKMG investigation suggests it was actually Anthony. The news station does not indicate indicate how it obtained the information for the timeline:

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/casey-anthony-trial-mistakes-2012-11#ixzz2CtKj37ur

I hope the BusinessInsider hears from it's readers, who complain about their lousy reporting.

 

[SunnyinMO]

AZlawyer posted this is the other thread, it's closed now, so I can't quote it over there.
What did Baez post on FB that was untrue?

"Oh, I almost forgot my message to Jose.

Jose, I'll send you a fax about this tomorrow, but (1) I am not a blogger, and (2) I am, indeed, admitted to some courts of law (AZ state courts, AZ federal courts, 9th Circuit federal court of appeal, and the US Supreme Court). As a professional courtesy, I will give you until close of business tomorrow (Orlando time) to publicly retract the untrue statements you made about me on your Facebook page.

And yes, I got the screenshot".

TIA.
btw great work AZ!


EDIT....Never mind I read the post AZ made later.

Please ignore.

As usual, I skipped ahead and obviously missed something....what did JB say about AZ??? He unfriended me a looooonnngggggg time ago....he didn't like reading the truth on his page:floorlaugh: As long as I am asking....I read last night that someone knew where she was now.....but can't find the post. Does anyone know for sure?? Thanks and will try to read faster:blushing:

 

[AZlawyer]

BBM
For discussion
Was is incriminating to Casey if it pointed to George if we go by Baez's (wrong) time of 1:50pm?

I believe Baez knew it was Casey, had to do damage control and had it fit into his George did it scenario.

Well, he wasn't required to disclose it either way, but I see your point.

 

[tsitra01]

I'm not suggesting an opinion is a conclusion - especially in todays news where opinions/news is directly slanted to which media outlet you are reading. That would be a dangerous thing. So yes, I agree with what you are saying. I just said it more strongly because i do think we could have have some thinkers on the jury rather than what we got.

ITA and I also feel that most people do form an opinion that can be strengthened or changed as you gather more information but for them to pick a jury that doesn't know anything about the case, doesn't watch the news or selected TV programs is wrong. It's what is presented during the trial that is important. It became very important to me to learn what happened to This little girl named Caylee. How is it reasonable to choose a juror who doesn't want to serve or one who doesn't watch the news or has heard a lot about the case. Does hat mean they can't make an honest decision on the quilt or innocence of the person on trial. What makes a disinterested party so desirable?

 

[SunnyinMO]

There would need to be a civil suit filed and IIRC, there's a limit of time for which that can be done.

AZLawyer, only Caylee's family can file it, I assume? And in that case, it's not going to happen. :tears:

If GA grew some, I think he could sue her. But, I have no hope of that happening.:banghead:

 

[eileenhawkeye]

I just posted that EXTRA has it up now. But I don't know how long it's been there.

Yeah, I saw it on Extra when I looked it up on Google News. CBS has picked it up now too. But nothing from ABC, FOX, CNN, NBC, Huff Post, The Associated Press, The Daily Beast, People, Yahoo, other local media across US, etc. They can be slow, and I would be shocked if all them don't have an article about it in the next few days.

 

[Kimster]

Yeah, I saw it on Extra when I looked it up on Google News. CBS has picked it up now too. But nothing from ABC, FOX, CNN, NBC, Huff Post, The Associated Press, The Daily Beast, People, Yahoo, other local media across US, etc. They can be slow, and I would be shocked if all them don't have an article about it in the next few days.

I wonder if any of them are waiting for tonight's episode?

 

[rossva]

BBM As does the prosecution.

Defense attorneys play a role injury selection. They zoom in on who they believe are morons wrapped in idiot. This was the only way this baby killer was going to get off. This may be a grasping at straws. Can someone go after her for human rights violation? I think theres a 7 year time limit.

 

[CarolinaMoon]

BBM
For discussion
Was it incriminating to Casey if it pointed to George if we go by Baez's (wrong) time of 1:50pm?

I believe Baez knew it was Casey, had to do damage control and had it fit into his George did it scenario.

O/T And just for the sake of point this out because Baez makes derogatory remarks that George can't spell, Maybe Casey can't TYPE properly.
I remember back in the day when we had to learn how to Type on manual or electric typewriters and the drills we had to do...and no looking down at the keys!!

LOL! Our keys were blank!

 

[Kimster]

And....the Huffington Post weighs in.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/21/casey-anthony-foolproof-suffocation_n_2172514.html


A spokesperson for Baez told the Sentinel that WKMG's report relies on someone who had never testified or been admitted as an expert in the court of law.

 

[SunnyinMO]

If GA grew some, I think he could sue her. But, I have no hope of that happening.:banghead:

oopssss I read further and saw that AZ said grandparents had no rights in FL....thanks AZ

 

[mysterymom7]

We didn't have the information until August, after we heard what Jose was saying in his book and made a public records request for the full internet history.



No. As I mentioned above, I don't think there is anyone who can sue her for wrongful death, but even if there were, she couldn't go to jail as a result of a civil suit.

Ok, good... not until after the trial... I may have had a slight flip out session here if it wasn't screamed about had it been known before trial.